From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/lrc: move lrc_get_runtime() to intel_lrc.c
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:54:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de1a91cf-9366-2c93-9159-3e31313db53a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214173810.2108975-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>
On 14/02/2022 17:38, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Move the static inline next to the only caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h | 11 -----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c
> index e86d8255feec..ece16c2b5b8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include "intel_engine_pm.h"
> #include "intel_gpu_commands.h"
> #include "intel_lrc.h"
> +#include "intel_lrc_reg.h"
> #include "intel_ring.h"
> #include "intel_sseu.h"
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 8189bc8a16ec..5b107b698b65 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1720,6 +1720,17 @@ static void st_update_runtime_underflow(struct intel_context *ce, s32 dt)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static u32 lrc_get_runtime(const struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> + /*
> + * We can use either ppHWSP[16] which is recorded before the context
> + * switch (and so excludes the cost of context switches) or use the
> + * value from the context image itself, which is saved/restored earlier
> + * and so includes the cost of the save.
> + */
> + return READ_ONCE(ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_TIMESTAMP]);
> +}
> +
> void lrc_update_runtime(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> u32 old;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h
> index 7f697845c4cf..2af85a15a370 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> #include "intel_context.h"
> -#include "intel_lrc_reg.h"
>
> struct drm_i915_gem_object;
> struct intel_engine_cs;
> @@ -68,15 +67,5 @@ void lrc_check_regs(const struct intel_context *ce,
> const char *when);
>
> void lrc_update_runtime(struct intel_context *ce);
> -static inline u32 lrc_get_runtime(const struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> - /*
> - * We can use either ppHWSP[16] which is recorded before the context
> - * switch (and so excludes the cost of context switches) or use the
> - * value from the context image itself, which is saved/restored earlier
> - * and so includes the cost of the save.
> - */
> - return READ_ONCE(ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_TIMESTAMP]);
> -}
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_LRC_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 36f1325baa7d..00fb40029f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@
> #include "gt/intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt_regs.h"
> #include "gt/intel_lrc.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_lrc_reg.h"
> #include "gt/intel_ring.h"
>
> #include "i915_drv.h"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 17:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/lrc: move lrc_get_runtime() to intel_lrc.c Jani Nikula
2022-02-14 17:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/lrc: replace include with forward declarations Jani Nikula
2022-02-15 15:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-15 15:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-02-16 2:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/lrc: move lrc_get_runtime() to intel_lrc.c Patchwork
2022-02-17 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/lrc: move lrc_get_runtime() to intel_lrc.c (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-17 12:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de1a91cf-9366-2c93-9159-3e31313db53a@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.