From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40C4C433E0 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B94222B4B for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:13:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0B94222B4B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFhbD4mLTzDqJY for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:13:12 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=gmills@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Z5pSVKRV; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DFhYM68RQzDr63 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:11:35 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10CK35IX055731; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:11:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=WfUyEl0m411vG16J0DmemJIv+N3FGvLGfPhw2S02CEs=; b=Z5pSVKRVnY57PUeQ67J3/lbUu1rdoEpBiJRYD96Nkr7ahb+sWOIdRiWQQ+krkMEH7ofr aiJd7qlsfUf5LaFQJmGfteoqewCC1TEzjemr56OQASZPAcuKT9g1pExFsY3bExJl8cFK QBM9mpoUPR3YTUtTnXyXt/wngK5i981Lxx5+DRfc+BJaRrdivRXkjRsQGsUwwu4QeANP 0Eq61T9/it8JNCoj9mKNcU5xkPdFI9CwUk5TduOG0Oq3MN6tGKtSyfT3vEiCOdsmPRbM 4qGIbB42n+eUYQfNq6BVEaqx2Z5QvrCBT4xcoCtc78TAa7fW3FkAcmzp4rsu1Y0X8HMw 0A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 361hqh9ckk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:11:29 -0500 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 10CK3Pvj057105; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:11:29 -0500 Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 361hqh9ckd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:11:29 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10CK3GwO023419; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:11:28 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 35y4490h4p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:11:28 +0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 10CKBSKo43647280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:11:28 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603D0AC05B; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3262AC05E; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:11:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.206.180.135] (unknown [9.206.180.135]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:11:26 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Call for volunteers To: Ed Tanous , Brad Bishop References: <20210111220919.zwc727vbwc4itm7h@thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com> From: Gunnar Mills Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:11:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-12_15:2021-01-12, 2021-01-12 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101120114 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC Maillist Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On 1/12/2021 9:55 AM, Ed Tanous wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 2:10 PM Brad Bishop wrote: >> >> Hello OpenBMC-ers! >> >> Your TSC has been aware of the problem of fragmentation in our project for some >> time. Fragmentation is a loose term - for the purposes of this note consider >> it to be any time contributor efforts in the community are duplicated without >> thought given to maintenance and/or compatibility. >> >> To begin to address this issue the TSC is looking for volunteers to serve on a >> "repository review forum" to which the TSC will initially delegate its >> authority in the areas of: >> - new repository creation >> - placement of contributed new function into existing repositories >> >> The TSC fully expects the scope of this forum to quickly grow into the role of >> a traditional TSC providing frequent, technical oversight to project >> contributors. The current TSC will continue to serve the project in terms of >> governance, advocacy and industry exposure - and likely get a rename (OpenBMC >> Board? or OpenBMC Steering Committee?) in the process. >> >> The new forum would meet periodically or at the demand of other forum members >> to: >> - raise the forums combined awareness of new function under development >> (information exchange) >> - build a consensus within the forum on where the function should exist >> - inform the function contributor and the rest of the community of the decision >> >> A successful forum would be a forum that can simultaneously encourage the >> contribution of new and innovative solutions to existing problems without >> introducing complexity to the project as a whole. >> >> A successful forum member will have previously demonstrated a breadth of >> understanding of the upstream OpenBMC codebase through: >> - frequent participation in peer review, the mailing list, IRC, and Discord. >> - submission of high quality designs and code to upstream OpenBMC >> (github.com/openbmc) >> - a history of working with and guiding less experienced OpenBMC developers >> in a timely manner, enabling them to come up to speed quickly. >> >> If you are interested in serving the project in this manner, please reply to >> submit yourself as a candidate. > > I'll volunteer. > I would like to nominate Brad. ;) > >> >> -brad, on the behalf of the OpenBMC TSC