From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Yongpeng Yang <monty_pavel@sina.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix incorrect extent flag when physical addr is NEW_ADDR in f2fs_fiemap
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:13:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df7554b5-b69d-42d7-aabc-148c882de82d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203133635.3942502-2-monty_pavel@sina.com>
FYI, there is a similar proposal previously:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230410020724.1817150-1-chao@kernel.org
On 2026/2/3 21:36, Yongpeng Yang wrote:
> From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
>
> When the file block's address is mapped to NEW_ADDR, the extent is
> currently marked with the FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN flag in f2fs_fiemap().
> This flag indicates that the block has been allocated but not yet
> written to. However, NEW_ADDR indicates delayed writing, meaning the
> block has not been allocated yet. Therefore, this should be modified
> such that when a file block's address is mapped to NEW_ADDR, the extent
> is marked with the FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC flags instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 84746a06cd58..42f15fd9c68e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -2102,7 +2102,7 @@ int f2fs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> size += F2FS_BLKSIZE;
> }
> } else if (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_DELALLOC) {
> - flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN;
> + flags = FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC;
> }
>
> start_blk += F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(size);
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 13:36 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix incorrect extent flag when physical addr is NEW_ADDR in f2fs_fiemap Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-03 13:36 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: fix incorrect file address mapping when inline inode is unwritten Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-04 9:14 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-03 13:36 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: fix fiemap boundary handling when read extent cache is incomplete Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-24 3:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-24 4:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-27 7:44 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-27 19:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-27 20:41 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 9:15 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-19 3:38 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-02-03 13:37 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: fix inline data not being written to disk in writeback path Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-04 9:30 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-06 8:55 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-04 9:13 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-03-06 9:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix incorrect extent flag when physical addr is NEW_ADDR in f2fs_fiemap Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-05 19:10 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df7554b5-b69d-42d7-aabc-148c882de82d@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=monty_pavel@sina.com \
--cc=yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.