From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lexington Luthor <lexington.luthor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Incite into reiser5?
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 21:28:38 +0100
Message-ID: <dfacls$4pd$2@sea.gmane.org>
References: <1125596442.5207.11.camel@jove> <b14e81f0050901193220855450@mail.gmail.com> <1125685758.9150.8.camel@jove> <43189B26.2030602@slaphack.com> <873bonuurh.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> <4318AB3B.1090204@slaphack.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25832-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <4318AB3B.1090204@slaphack.com>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

David Masover wrote:
> It has one.  It's called Lustre.
> 
> What Linux needs is good, distributed filesystem that runs on the 2.6 
> kernel, without users having to pay licensing fees.
> 

Lustre is expensive, but the -mm kernel now has ocfs (or is it ocfs2?) 
as well as gfs.

What is wrong with either of those two?

LL