All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dth@cistron.nl (Danny ter Haar)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: why _less_ performance on machine with SMP then with UP kernel ?
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:16:53 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dg8f8l$80n$1@news.cistron.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200509132254.15158.andrew@walrond.org

Andrew Walrond  <andrew@walrond.org> wrote:
>> So what is the difference between UP & SMP ?
>Is there any indication in the system log that your userland (news?) software 
>was having problems?

Not really. The load of the machine doesn't get that high as normal.
On machines that feed usenet to us (usenet ==push system) i see that we
grow "backlog" (we're not accepting usenet as fast as we should).

>It may be entirely unrelated to your problem, but you 
>should anyway be aware of a nasty unresolved issue with all smp kernels >=  
>2.6.12 on smp x86_64 systems:
>
>	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4851


Now that you mention it, i saw this in the log file when running the SMP
kernel:

newsgate kernel: mv[7024]: segfault at 00002aaaaabc3648 rip 00002aaaaaaac80e 
 rsp 00007fffffdc17c0 error 4

It was only a oneliner, no further details.

>If you have any indication of userland problems, you might try
>	echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
>which much reduces (but seemingly does not completely remove) this issue for 
>most people.

What i  did try is the following (prior on other SMP kernels)
I tried binding certain processes to a certain cpu.
Did the same for the irq's.
Just to see if it mattered.

It didn't...

>> A very confused
>One of the major symptoms of this particular bug ;)

I know, that's why a plee for help is _my_ only resort ;-)
I do understand that at this level most people send in patches.

Thanks for your reply!

Will try the "echo 0" next time i boot a smp kernel.

Danny



  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-14  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-13 21:12 Q: why _less_ performance on machine with SMP then with UP kernel ? Danny ter Haar
2005-09-13 21:54 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-09-14  6:16   ` Danny ter Haar [this message]
2005-09-14  7:58     ` Andrew Walrond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='dg8f8l$80n$1@news.cistron.nl' \
    --to=dth@cistron.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.