From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Charles Duffy <cduffy@spamcop.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] network-bridge script support for multiple
 external interfaces
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:51:34 -0500
Message-ID: <dipjqs$tm$2@sea.gmane.org>
References: <diobg9$2ri$1@sea.gmane.org> <434FE495.8020209@blueyonder.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <434FE495.8020209@blueyonder.co.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

David Hopwood wrote:
> Charles Duffy wrote:
>>  # antispoof  Whether to use iptables to prevent spoofing (default yes).
> [...]
>>  antispoof=${antispoof:-no}
> 
> The antispoof default is not consistent with the comment.
> 

Quite so. (That's original behavior, though, and so any fix for it 
should be checked in as a separate changeset -- from my 
revision-control-nazi days I still have a strong preference for keeping 
different fixes in different changesets so that they can be merged, 
accepted or rejected, and otherwise handled individually).