From: Wes Felter <wesley@felter.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Status of X86_P4_CLOCKMOD?
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:17:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dtvqaa$1et$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060225125337.GB8698@linuxtv.org>
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> If someone has done measurements I'd be interested to
> know the numbers about the actual power savings which
> can be achieved by using P4 clock mod. I don't expect
> it to be much, but I bet it's more than 1W.
Clock modulation can reduce power by 40W on a 3.6GHz Xeon when the
system is running a high-power application (e.g. Linpack). (It also
reduces performance by a factor of 6-10). Clock modulation saves no
power at all during idle.
Wes Felter - wesley@felter.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-27 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-14 15:22 [2.6 patch] make INPUT a bool Adrian Bunk
2006-02-14 18:14 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-14 18:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-14 23:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-17 15:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-17 16:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-20 3:33 ` Samuel Masham
2006-02-20 13:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-22 1:34 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-02-22 2:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-22 2:44 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-02-22 3:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-22 3:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-02-23 19:59 ` Status of X86_P4_CLOCKMOD? Adrian Bunk
2006-02-23 20:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-23 23:15 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 23:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-23 23:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 2:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-24 2:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 17:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-25 1:57 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-25 4:24 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-25 12:53 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-27 21:17 ` Wes Felter [this message]
2006-02-25 4:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-25 12:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-25 13:28 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-02-26 11:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-26 20:39 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-26 20:55 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-02-26 23:37 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-25 13:36 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-25 13:05 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-28 19:46 ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-28 20:09 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-28 20:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-02-28 20:47 ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-28 20:57 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-02-28 21:26 ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-28 21:34 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-02-28 21:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-02-28 22:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-22 12:01 ` [2.6 patch] make INPUT a bool Herbert Poetzl
2006-02-22 12:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-22 18:09 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-02-25 11:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-02-25 12:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-25 14:22 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-25 14:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-25 15:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-25 15:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-25 22:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-25 22:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-25 22:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-02-26 18:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-27 7:11 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2006-02-27 12:59 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2006-02-25 14:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-15 6:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-02-16 23:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-17 1:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='dtvqaa$1et$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=wesley@felter.org \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.