From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug?
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:10:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <du9m9r$ddi$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060303144824.GA15672@hactar.lan
Kasper Dupont <87385155133026632046@expires.04.sep.2006.kasperd.net> wrote:
> On the 2.6 system where I see the differences between mirrors
> /proc/ide/hde/settings:wcache 1
write cache enabled.
Btw... don't disable it on a production system without previously
thinking about it :) Disabling write cache leads to massive performance
decrease on heavy simultaneous I/O... On a system with (IMHO not heavy
but significant) simultaneous I/O I got 35MB/s write speed on dd with
write cache enabled and it shrunk down to 9MB/s with write cache
disabled - while load grew up from ~0 to ~8.
> On a 2.4 system where I see no differences between mirrors I
> /proc/ide/hde/settings:wcache 0 0 1 rw
> So how should I interpret this?
As I said - on 2.4 write cache reporting through /proc is broken: it
always reports disabled write cache, while it is not necessarily
disabled. Use hdparm -I instead (big I, not small i).
regards
Mario
--
"Why are we hiding from the police, daddy?" | J. E. Guenther
"Because we use SuSE son, they use SYSVR4." | de.alt.sysadmin.recovery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-03 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 12:44 No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug? Kasper Dupont
2006-03-01 13:58 ` Luca Berra
2006-03-01 16:24 ` Mike Hardy
2006-03-01 21:56 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-02 13:48 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 13:39 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 14:30 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 22:26 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 23:01 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 9:01 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-04 10:10 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 7:30 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 12:03 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 12:38 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 14:48 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 15:10 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe [this message]
2006-03-04 13:16 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-04 13:38 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 19:50 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 10:47 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-07 11:18 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 12:12 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10 7:43 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10 7:49 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 7:24 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 14:04 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='du9m9r$ddi$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=mario.holbe@tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.