All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@thinrope.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: mtime (default) resolution and why is it such?
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:41:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dv2115$46a$2@sea.gmane.org> (raw)

Hi all,

There were some discussions on the subversion dev list about "svn and
shell scripts: managing properties" that boiled down to very quick
changes to a file (by sed) without changing its mtime ...

So I started to dig the kernel code to see what exactly is the mtime
resolution...

I could pin it down to include/linux:824

	/* Granuality of c/m/atime in ns.
	   Cannot be worse than a second */
	u32		   s_time_gran;

*** I feel this comment is wrong, should be granuLARity, submitting
*** a patch separately: 
*** [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Fix comments in 2.6.16-rc6: s/granuality/granularity/

But looking further down, I found fs/super.c:88

		s->s_time_gran = 1000000000;

So it seems that the default s_time_gran is 1 second... I was interested
for reiserfs, as that is the main fs I use.

Some filesystems use 1ns (nfs, jfs, xfs...), some 100ns (cifs, ntfs,
smbfs)... 

So I have quite a few questions popping in my head:

1. Is there any particular design concern with this?

2. Would speed performance be drowning if I (later we) play with the
   default, or at least patch reiserfs to use say 0.001s ?

3. What could be affected and how do I measure performance drop?

I understand that is not the root couse for the subversion problem, but
it may help me understand the problem better, so if you can spare a bit
of time to answer my quiestions I'd be gratefull.

Kalin.

-- 
|[ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ]|
+-> http://ThinRope.net/ <-+
|[ ______________________ ]|



                 reply	other threads:[~2006-03-12 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='dv2115$46a$2@sea.gmane.org' \
    --to=kalin@thinrope.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.