From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wang, Haiyue" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] eSPI: add Aspeed AST2500 eSPI driver to boot a host with PCH runs on eSPI Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 22:34:07 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1514512387-27113-1-git-send-email-haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com> <20180103113805.GD5603@sirena.org.uk> <004d3017-5477-ec42-c78a-aba0ca0621bc@linux.intel.com> <20180103143226.GI5603@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Joel Stanley , gregkh , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-spi To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180103143226.GI5603@sirena.org.uk> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On 2018-01-03 22:32, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:28:22PM +0800, Wang, Haiyue wrote: > >> Should send to like this ? Because I add patch for Aspeed chip: >> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c >> Joel Stanley (maintainer:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT) >> Arnd Bergmann (supporter:CHAR and MISC DRIVERS) >> Greg Kroah-Hartman (supporter:CHAR and MISC >> DRIVERS) >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > So it's not actually doing anything at all with the SPI subsystem? I > lacked any context for the discussion having been copied in part way > through. If it is a SPI controller it ought to have been in > drivers/spi. Yes, eSPI just uses the SPI pin definition, but it replaces LPC interface.