Hi Karthik,
Thanks for reviewing my patch.
Agree. i will fix and float in next rev.Hi,
On 6/13/2025 1:47 AM, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
I see few of the tests passing with this filter where we've upscale on the second plane. We need a more specific filter here.The second scaler does not support downscaling in either vertical or horizontal dimensions. Blocklist the affected IGT kms_plane_scaling tests that involve downscaling scenarios unsupported by the second scaler. Bspec: 69901 Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com> --- tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt index ebe1ff006..8e43c217d 100644 --- a/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt +++ b/tests/intel-ci/xe.blocklist.txt @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ igt@kms_pm_rpm@cursor.* ################################################################## igt@kms_atomic@plane-primary-overlay-mutable-zpos igt@kms_plane_scaling@.*downscale-factor-0-25.* +igt@kms_plane_scaling@planes-downscale-factor-.*5
Yes we can combine. i will fix and float next rev.Could the above 2 can be combined into one? 'igt@kms_plane_scaling@planes-upscale-.*-downscale-factor-.*'+igt@kms_plane_scaling@planes-upscale-20x20-downscale-factor-.* +igt@kms_plane_scaling@planes-upscale-factor-0-25-downscale-factor-.*
It is not required. I will remove this in next rev.+igt@kms_plane_scaling@planes-unity-scaling-downscale-factor-.*This I see is mostly passing other than 0.25 which is blocklisted already. Do we need this?
Thanks,
Karthik.B.Sigt@kms_prime@.* igt@kms_scaling_modes@scaling-mode-none igt@kms_writeback@writeback.*