From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>,
"Fabio M . De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/test: Remove ret_limit race condition in mock_get_event()
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:17:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e15ea41e-3237-4ef5-8149-96f7f1d3e3c2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116013819.1713780-1-alison.schofield@intel.com>
On 11/15/25 6:37 PM, Alison Schofield wrote:
> Commit 364ee9f3265e ("cxl/test: Enhance event testing") changed the
> loop iterator in mock_get_event() from a static constant,
> CXL_TEST_EVENT_CNT, to a dynamic global variable, ret_limit. The
> intent was to vary the number of events returned per call to simulate
> events occurring while logs are being read.
>
> However, ret_limit is modified without synchronization. When multiple
> threads call mock_get_event() concurrently, one thread may read
> ret_limit, another thread may increment it, and the first thread's
> loop condition and size calculation see and use the updated value.
>
> This is visible during cxl_test module load when all memdevs are
> initializing simultaneously, which includes getting event records. It
> is not tied to the cxl-events.sh unit test specifically, as that
> operates on a single memdev.
>
> While no actual harm results (the buffer is always large enough and
> the record count fields correctly reflect what was written), this is
> a correctness issue. The race creates an inconsistent state within
> mock_get_event() and adding variability based on a race appears
> unintended.
>
> Make ret_limit a local variable populated from an atomic counter. Each
> call gets a stable value that won't change during execution. That
> preserves the intended behavior of varying the return counts across
> calls while eliminating the race condition.
>
> This implementation uses "+ 1" to produce the full range of 1 to
> CXL_TEST_EVENT_RET_MAX (4) records. Previously only 1, 2, 3 were
> produced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>> ---
>
> This was found while chasing a NULL payload_out issue in mock_get_event()
> that Itaru reported here [1] and Fabio and I have both seen but not been
> able to reliably reproduce. Although the accounting can be wrong wrt
> ret_limit, no potential overflow was found.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/49A4B521-AB66-4037-A23D-1D0D7AF0F42F@linux.dev/
>
>
> tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
> index d533481672b7..6809c4a26f5e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
> @@ -250,22 +250,22 @@ static void mes_add_event(struct mock_event_store *mes,
> * Vary the number of events returned to simulate events occuring while the
> * logs are being read.
> */
> -static int ret_limit = 0;
> +static atomic_t event_counter = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>
> static int mock_get_event(struct device *dev, struct cxl_mbox_cmd *cmd)
> {
> struct cxl_get_event_payload *pl;
> struct mock_event_log *log;
> u16 nr_overflow;
> + int ret_limit;
> u8 log_type;
> int i;
>
> if (cmd->size_in != sizeof(log_type))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret_limit = (ret_limit + 1) % CXL_TEST_EVENT_RET_MAX;
> - if (!ret_limit)
> - ret_limit = 1;
> + /* Vary return limit from 1 to CXL_TEST_EVENT_RET_MAX */
> + ret_limit = (atomic_inc_return(&event_counter) % CXL_TEST_EVENT_RET_MAX) + 1;
>
> if (cmd->size_out < struct_size(pl, records, ret_limit))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> base-commit: e9a6fb0bcdd7609be6969112f3fbfcce3b1d4a7c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 1:37 [PATCH] cxl/test: Remove ret_limit race condition in mock_get_event() Alison Schofield
2025-11-18 2:12 ` Ira Weiny
2025-11-18 23:17 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2025-11-18 23:35 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e15ea41e-3237-4ef5-8149-96f7f1d3e3c2@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.