From: "Zhang, Chen" <chen.zhang@intel.com>
To: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: return -1 if no packet is queued
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:41:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1841d5119ff4d82ad01586d08ea45ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922095525.4081603-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:55 PM
> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>; jasowang@redhat.com
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: return -1 if no packet is queued
>
> Return 0 will trigger a packet comparison
>
Yes, we need active trigger a checkpoint to flush all the queued packets here.
Otherwise, we should drop all the packet after this time still next checkpoint.
So, I think original logic is a better choice.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/colo-compare.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index
> 3a45d64175..039b515611 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int
> mode, Connection **con)
> "queue size too big, drop packet");
> packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> pkt = NULL;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> *con = conn;
> --
> 2.28.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-22 9:55 [PATCH 0/3] colo-compare: minor fixes Li Zhijian
2020-09-22 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: return -1 if no packet is queued Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 1:41 ` Zhang, Chen [this message]
2020-09-23 6:17 ` Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 6:51 ` Zhang, Chen
2020-09-22 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] colo-compare: fix missing compare_seq initialization Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 1:42 ` Zhang, Chen
2020-09-22 9:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] colo-compare: check mark in mutual exclusion Li Zhijian
2020-09-23 1:46 ` Zhang, Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1841d5119ff4d82ad01586d08ea45ec@intel.com \
--to=chen.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.