From: Arik Raffael Funke <arik.funke@gmx.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Matching with Layer7 vs. IPP2P
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:47:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e23tr3$ce3$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
Hi,
can anybody comment on the cost of matching with IPP2P vs. Layer7.
Also, does a iptables rule with more complicated matching mechanism also
slow down processing if all the packets are matched before they reach
the rule. I.e. is the mere existence of a potentially costly rule
already slowing down processing or only if packets are actually
processed by it?
Thanks very much in advance.
Best regards,
Arik
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-18 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-18 23:47 Arik Raffael Funke [this message]
2006-04-19 7:35 ` [LARTC] Matching with Layer7 vs. IPP2P Jandre Olivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='e23tr3$ce3$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=arik.funke@gmx.de \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.