From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i69BhlrT018645 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 07:43:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i69BhRbg028492 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:43:28 GMT Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d19so207784rnf for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:43:38 +0100 From: Bradley Chapman To: russell@coker.com.au Subject: Re: An SELinux policy for Red Hat 9 Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov In-Reply-To: <200407092111.55045.russell@coker.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII References: <200407092111.55045.russell@coker.com.au> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Mr. Coker, On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:11:55 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 06:17, Bradley Chapman wrote: > > Does anyone know of a good place where I can start reading about how > > to adapt, or obtain, an SELinux policy for Red Hat 9, running the > > 2.6.7 kernel with the SELinux userspace package dated 20040628-16? > > Why would you want to do that? Consider Fedora Core 1 as RHL 10, and FC2 as > RHL 11 an just upgrade a couple of versions to get SE Linux support. I would do that - except for the fact that the system I want to run SELinux on is my personal system, and upgrading it is currently not something I wish to do. I may want to upgrade to FC2 later, but right now I want to stick with RHL9. > > But if you REALLY want to use RHL 9, the current policy should work OK, you > just have to make the appropriate changes to pam, logrotate, cron, coreutils, > etc. What sort of changes? Path changes? Thanks, Brad -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.