All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes in snps-phy HDMI PLL algorithm
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 17:26:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2d8f3bd-112d-4e5a-9e6e-9a394b62d797@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e0169d6e2d533e4b0175937961d91ae8da4799e@intel.com>


On 6/19/2025 1:21 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
>> Fixes/improvement in snps-phy HDMI PLL algorithm.
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Thank you once again, Jani, for pointing out the sparse warning and for 
your reviews.

The series has been pushed to drm-intel-next.

Regards,

Ankit

>
>> Ankit Nautiyal (2):
>>    drm/i915/snps_hdmi_pll: Fix 64-bit divisor truncation by using
>>      div64_u64
>>    drm/i915/snps_hdmi_pll: Use clamp() instead of max(min())
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_hdmi_pll.c | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 13:09 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes in snps-phy HDMI PLL algorithm Ankit Nautiyal
2025-06-18 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/snps_hdmi_pll: Fix 64-bit divisor truncation by using div64_u64 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-06-18 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/snps_hdmi_pll: Use clamp() instead of max(min()) Ankit Nautiyal
2025-06-18 13:21   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-18 13:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Fixes in snps-phy HDMI PLL algorithm Patchwork
2025-06-18 13:41 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-06-18 14:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-06-18 14:36 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-06-18 19:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Jani Nikula
2025-06-19 11:56   ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-06-19  4:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for " Patchwork
2025-06-19  5:44 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-06-19  9:23 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2d8f3bd-112d-4e5a-9e6e-9a394b62d797@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.