From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Hays Subject: Re: process killed Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:28:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20050428074006.GB24599@taniwha.stupidest.org> Reply-To: Brian Hays Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050428074006.GB24599@taniwha.stupidest.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Chris Wedgwood , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Yeah, Ive tried it with 64MB all the way up to 512MB of RAM allocated to the domU. I definitely think it's related to memory though...As soon as I start the DigiChat process you can see the memory spike full and it doesn't seem to use swap at all....about a second or two after starting it will just give the process ID and say "killed". Thanks, Brian On 4/28/05, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:24:41PM -0400, Brian Hays wrote: >=20 > > I've come across a strange problem when installing a particular > > software package in a domU. I'm trying to install DigiChat > > (http://www.digichat.com/downloads.html) and the process is > > immediately killed. >=20 > Killed how? With what signal? >=20 > My guess is OOM. Add more memory to domU and see if that helps. >=20 > > Is there anything about Java that Xen doesn't play nice with right > > now? >=20 > My guess is that it uses lots of memory. >=20 > Does the JVM use TLS a lot? I'm guessing not if it works under UML. > Something else to check anyhow. >