From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com,
saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com,
alexanderduyck@fb.com, kernel-team@meta.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com, almasrymina@google.com,
dtatulea@nvidia.com, bobbyeshleman@meta.com,
asml.silence@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
razor@blackwall.org, leitao@debian.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
leon@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] bnxt_en: let the stack segment GSO skbs with too many frags
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:29:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4def2839d68382fd50e4fe1e6b4f116@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179418737248.994134.10509157155829463489@kernel.org>
> > +#if (MAX_SKB_FRAGS > TX_MAX_FRAGS)
> > + if (skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags > TX_MAX_FRAGS)
> > + features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
> > +#endif
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Should this patch have a Fixes: tag?
>
> Commit b91e82129400 ("bnxt_en: Linearize TX SKB if the fragments exceed
> the max") added the unconditional linearize in bnxt_start_xmit():
[..]
> The commit message describes both problems. Without a Fixes: tag, stable
> kernels that carry b91e82129400 won't pick up this fix.
Will add a Fixes tag, but not sure it's worth the backports..
> [Severity: Low]
> Can the segments that the stack produces here still have more than
> TX_MAX_FRAGS unreadable frags?
[..]
> Could the commit message mention this limitation? Fully closing the gap
> would need a fallback that handles unreadable frags, or a frag limit per
> MSS window at sendmsg time, rather than skb_linearize().
Not sure what's suggested here. The example that's given goes via skb_linearize
and fails cleanly (as expected). Handling this in a better manner is out of
scope?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 22:20 [PATCH net-next v3 0/9] net: devmem: size TX net_iovs from the dmabuf layout Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] bnxt_en: let the stack segment GSO skbs with too many frags Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 18:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-11-10 22:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] net: devmem: charge the frag length to TX skb truesize Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 10:59 ` Breno Leitao
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/9] net: devmem: use niov_shift in net_devmem_get_niov_at() Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/9] net: devmem: add a per-device netmem TX frag size limit Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 18:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-10 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-11 21:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/9] bnxt_en: set the netmem TX frag size limit to 32KB Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 18:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/9] eth: fbnic: " Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] net/mlx5e: lift the netmem TX frag size limit Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 18:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: devmem: size TX net_iovs from the dmabuf sg table Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-09 18:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-05 22:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 9/9] selftests: drv-net: devmem: TX from a hugepage-backed dmabuf Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-09 1:23 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4def2839d68382fd50e4fe1e6b4f116@gmail.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.