From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB51CC433EF for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229491AbhLPAzg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:55:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55212 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229441AbhLPAzg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:55:36 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959FDC061574; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3416A61B9D; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 443D5C36AE0; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:55:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1639616134; bh=MgOVf7oYnbO0CV8WsVsPfMF9dAleUAT184aOIMZy4f4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=i7UYbGhnM2WWxFyozM3Yk5g+dkhscighvYkcendwxWCXwNHRxO/fKDZJ+SoKFZRwm Ix17TZNcLzmoO9OmkSF7pC6vGNTsBzLVqlZLOQL9JDOL5MmQZ0GIxN5hgm+XlWu0Im VwuWSYKms5OVK6/nsYveCchm8eJOqXddmrvD6sgcy2upqAUATgTZevlOMVmL8rYbiZ kuwMn3bnffq47rVq2BKide6O1H4bWyx8H6jcBz5jz/07NavRUXB41mWucSYQGwTp7O xKcVvUV+a3SoFM9l+dUf3n8piXt11cvKicaSoVCLhzUJp7xxooRgCuXaQEwvQ8kxJ6 xKhFv7xN1PRTA== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [pull-request] mlx5-next branch 2021-12-15 From: Saeed Mahameed To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Leon Romanovsky , Jason Gunthorpe , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:55:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20211215154403.40563759@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20211215184945.185708-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20211215112319.44d7daea@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20211215145856.4a29e48b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <2697f58ef720d6b8f9163ea1151a4daba7043e86.camel@kernel.org> <20211215154403.40563759@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.2 (3.42.2-1.fc35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 15:44 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:35:09 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 14:58 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:14:11 +0000 Saeed Mahameed wrote:  > > > > already posted before : > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211201193621.9129-1- > > > > saeed@kernel.org/ > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211208141722.13646-1- > > > > shayd@nvidia.com/  > > > > > > Post them as a reply to the pull request like you usually do, > > > please.  > > > > They were already posted, and reviewed, and all maintainers were > > CC'ed, > > including you, why do you want me to spam the mailing list over and > > over again with the same patches ? > > You reposting measly 5 patches is hardly spamming. I have scripts > which That's not the point, sometimes it is less or much more than 5. For mlx5-next (Shared branch between RDMA and netdev), I would like to submit standard clean PRs like all other maintainers. > check if the contents of the PR match the posting, which obviously > can't follow random links from the email. > The script is great to validate pseudo-PRs (netdev only) where we post patches for the first time in the PR. but this is different, this is a true clean PR where all patches already posted and reviewed. the tree is already written genuinely in ink! > > This is not how genuine pull requests are supposed to work. > > I'm not comfortable with blindly pulling patches from vendor trees. Good to know and very disappointing, is there anything i could do to make you better trust my mlx5-next PRs ? other than RE-posting ? Again I don't see any point of RE-posting the patches together with a clean PR, redundant and unnecessary and against all standards, it just cancels the whole process and duplicates my work, and will confuse other maintainers who might have already pulled part or all of the patches in the branch.