From: Henning Rohlfs <x+btrfs@xehonk.de>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Abysmal Performance
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5b85820126546a3369499aebb166c60@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308669852.2106.7.camel@ayu>
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:24:11 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 23:51 +0200, Henning Rohlfs wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've migrated my system to btrfs (raid1) a few months ago. Since=20
>> then
>> the performance has been pretty bad, but recently it's gotten
>> unbearable: a simple sync called while the system is idle can take=20
>> 20 up
>> to 60 seconds. Creating or deleting files often has several seconds
>> latency, too.
>
> I think I=E2=80=99ve been seeing a fairly similar, or possibly the sa=
me?=20
> issue
> as well. It looks like it=E2=80=99s actually a regression introduced =
in=20
> 2.6.39 -
> if I switch back to a 2.6.38 kernel, my latency issues magically go
> away! (I'm curious: does using the older 2.6.38.x kernel help with
> anyone else that's seeing the issue?)
>
> Some hardware/configuration details:
> btrfs on a single disc (Seagate Momentus XT hybrid), lzo compression=20
> and
> space cache enabled. Some snapshots in use.
>
> I notice that in latencytop I'm seeing a lot of lines with (cropped)
> traces like
>
> sleep_on_page wait_on_page_bit read_extent_buffer_ 13.3 msec =
=20
> 0.5 %
>
> showing up that I didn't see with the 2.6.38 kernel. I occasionally=20
> see
> latencies as bad as 20-30 seconds on operations like fsync or
> synchronous writes.
>
> I think I can reproduce the issue well enough to bisect it, so I=20
> might
> give that a try. It'll be slow going, though.
You are right. This seems to be a regression in the .39 kernel. I=20
tested with 2.6.38.2 just now and the performance is back to normal.
Thanks,
Henning
server ~ # uname -a
Linux server 2.6.38.2 #1 SMP Thu Apr 14 13:05:35 CEST 2011 x86_64 AMD=20
Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
server ~ # sync; time sync
real 0m0.144s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.020s
server ~ # bonnie++ -d tmp -u 0:0
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-=20
--Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--=20
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP =
=20
/sec %CP
server 16G 147 97 279933 56 73245 34 1258 78 102379 2=
3=20
177.3 50
Latency 423ms 103ms 645ms 163ms 404ms =
=20
264ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random=20
Create--------
server -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---=20
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP =
=20
/sec %CP
16 3784 28 +++++ +++ 8519 60 13694 59 +++++ +++=20
11710 76
Latency 127ms 1024us 18718us 15958us 119us =
=20
2459us
1.96,1.96,server,1,1308745595,16G,,147,97,279933,56,73245,34,1258,78,1=
02379,23,177.3,50,16,,,,,3784,28,+++++,+++,8519,60,13694,59,+++++,+++,1=
1710,76,423ms,103ms,645ms,163ms,404ms,264ms,127ms,1024us,18718us,15958u=
s,119us,2459us
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-20 21:51 Abysmal Performance Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 0:12 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-21 7:10 ` Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 8:00 ` Sander
2011-06-21 9:26 ` Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 15:18 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-21 16:55 ` Henning Rohlfs
2011-06-21 15:24 ` Calvin Walton
2011-06-22 14:15 ` Henning Rohlfs [this message]
2011-06-22 15:39 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-22 15:57 ` Calvin Walton
2011-06-22 15:58 ` Josef Bacik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-29 14:46 abysmal performance John Wyzer
2011-04-29 15:01 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-30 17:33 ` Mitch Harder
2011-04-30 20:40 ` John Wyzer
2011-04-30 22:16 ` Mitch Harder
2011-04-30 22:33 ` John Wyzer
2011-05-03 11:05 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 11:06 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-30 23:55 ` Peter Stuge
2011-05-03 10:33 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 11:00 ` cwillu
2011-05-03 11:26 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 11:08 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 11:30 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 11:36 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 11:43 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 12:52 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 13:03 ` Bernhard Schmidt
2011-05-03 13:41 ` Mitch Harder
2011-05-03 14:41 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-05-03 15:42 ` Mitch Harder
2011-05-03 16:51 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-03 14:54 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-05-03 15:10 ` Bernhard Schmidt
[not found] ` <1304100271-sup-4177@localhost>
[not found] ` <1304100862-sup-1493@think>
[not found] ` <1304107977-sup-3815@localhost>
[not found] ` <1304110058-sup-7292@think>
[not found] ` <1304146193-sup-2200@localhost>
2011-04-30 20:51 ` John Wyzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5b85820126546a3369499aebb166c60@localhost \
--to=x+btrfs@xehonk.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.