From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
song@kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] md/raid10: fix improper BUG_ON() in raise_barrier()
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 19:37:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6055714-d6da-3dac-8776-281602ffb099@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220916113428.774061-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 9/16/22 7:34 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> 'conf->barrier' is protected by 'conf->resync_lock', reading
> 'conf->barrier' without holding the lock is wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index cf452c25e1e5..9a28abd19709 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -936,8 +936,8 @@ static void flush_pending_writes(struct r10conf *conf)
>
> static void raise_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, int force)
> {
> - BUG_ON(force && !conf->barrier);
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> + BUG_ON(force && !conf->barrier);
>
> /* Wait until no block IO is waiting (unless 'force') */
> wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier, force || !conf->nr_waiting,
Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
Thanks,
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-18 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-16 11:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] md/raid10: factor out code from wait_barrier() to stop_waiting_barrier() Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 18:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-18 11:40 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-16 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] md/raid10: don't modify 'nr_waitng' in wait_barrier() for the case nowait Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 18:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-18 11:40 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-16 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] md/raid10: prevent unnecessary calls to wake_up() in fast path Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 18:36 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-18 11:38 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-16 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] md/raid10: fix improper BUG_ON() in raise_barrier() Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 18:36 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-18 11:37 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2022-09-16 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] md/raid10: convert resync_lock to use seqlock Yu Kuai
2022-09-16 18:37 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-18 11:36 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-19 1:08 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-19 10:28 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-19 19:08 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6055714-d6da-3dac-8776-281602ffb099@linux.dev \
--to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.