diff for duplicates of <e6550ef1ea27499e3bc093e264c54d0f@mail.gmail.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index cb638ae..b72284c 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,23 +1,23 @@ Hi Paul, > -----Original Message----- -> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@pwsan.com] +> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul at pwsan.com] > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 10:25 PM > To: Cousson, Benoit; Nayak, Rajendra -> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP2+ hwmod fixes > -> Hello Benoît, Rajendra, +> Hello Beno?t, Rajendra, > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > > > On 2/16/2011 2:43 PM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- -> > > > From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson@ti.com] +> > > > From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson at ti.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:37 PM > > > > To: Nayak, Rajendra -> > > > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; paul@pwsan.com; -> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +> > > > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; paul at pwsan.com; +> > > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP2+ hwmod fixes > > > > > > > > Hi Rajendra, @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ upon > > 1. If the rest of the code can be changed to gracefully handle cases where -> hwmod initialization fails, and if Benoît agrees, I don't have a problem +> hwmod initialization fails, and if Beno?t agrees, I don't have a problem > with changing the iterator behavior to ignore failures as you describe. > Of course, all of the current users of omap_hwmod_for_each*() would need > to be checked to ensure that this behavior makes sense for them. @@ -143,7 +143,3 @@ not > > > - Paul --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d2a49d7..3c63355 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,36 +3,32 @@ "ref\06cc4b2788ff1e15c22987d5db91f0395@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\04D5E85EA.70605@ti.com\0" "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.00.1102210901140.22636@utopia.booyaka.com\0" - "From\0Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>\0" - "Subject\0RE: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP2+ hwmod fixes\0" + "From\0rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 0/3] OMAP2+ hwmod fixes\0" "Date\0Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:41:36 +0530\0" - "To\0Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>" - Cousson - " Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com>\0" - "Cc\0linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Paul,\n" "\n" "> -----Original Message-----\n" - "> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@pwsan.com]\n" + "> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul at pwsan.com]\n" "> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 10:25 PM\n" "> To: Cousson, Benoit; Nayak, Rajendra\n" - "> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + "> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org\n" "> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP2+ hwmod fixes\n" ">\n" - "> Hello Beno\303\256t, Rajendra,\n" + "> Hello Beno?t, Rajendra,\n" ">\n" "> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Cousson, Benoit wrote:\n" ">\n" "> > On 2/16/2011 2:43 PM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:\n" "> > > > -----Original Message-----\n" - "> > > > From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson@ti.com]\n" + "> > > > From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson at ti.com]\n" "> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:37 PM\n" "> > > > To: Nayak, Rajendra\n" - "> > > > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; paul@pwsan.com;\n" - "> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + "> > > > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; paul at pwsan.com;\n" + "> > > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org\n" "> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP2+ hwmod fixes\n" "> > > >\n" "> > > > Hi Rajendra,\n" @@ -144,7 +140,7 @@ ">\n" "> 1. If the rest of the code can be changed to gracefully handle cases\n" "where\n" - "> hwmod initialization fails, and if Beno\303\256t agrees, I don't have a problem\n" + "> hwmod initialization fails, and if Beno?t agrees, I don't have a problem\n" "> with changing the iterator behavior to ignore failures as you describe.\n" "> Of course, all of the current users of omap_hwmod_for_each*() would need\n" "> to be checked to ensure that this behavior makes sense for them.\n" @@ -157,10 +153,6 @@ "> sure that both cases are needed. Ideas, feedback here are welcome.\n" ">\n" ">\n" - "> - Paul\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-omap\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + > - Paul -799b8a9c2408fd2743c9a2c57ea04ffd351637bc890840daa4b5ee3639fce38c +a8ba3417cef1bc615a86485ddda8bde1d07a76a49292253497e632929e96491d
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.