From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Maxwell Subject: Re: reiser4 performance Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:55:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <42F7A01A.7090209@namesys.com> <42F7F6DC.2080706@slaphack.com> <42F807D7.9090900@slaphack.com> Reply-To: Gregory Maxwell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42F807D7.9090900@slaphack.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David Masover Cc: ReiserFS List On 8/8/05, David Masover wrote: > "Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's > getting even better pretty fast. >=20 > And, by the way, if the transaction interface gets done, it's not just > databases that will benefit, but also small files. After all, what kind > of transactions are used for your OpenOffice document? =20 ... Well there doesn't actually need to be a transaction interface for postgresql's needs.. it just needs a fairly limited set of assurances from the VFS/FS that ... aren't usually provided. Beyond that, it already handles its own transactions. It looks like from Hans' reply the reiser4 already provides everything needed.. which I had suspected.