From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Maxwell Subject: Re: reiser4 performance Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:03:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <42F7A01A.7090209@namesys.com> <42F7F6DC.2080706@slaphack.com> <42F807D7.9090900@slaphack.com> Reply-To: Gregory Maxwell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42F807D7.9090900@slaphack.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David Masover , ReiserFS List On 8/8/05, David Masover wrote: > Absolutely. I'm not knocking your idea, just wanted to clarify that > "Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's > getting even better pretty fast. (sorry for reply bloat) I just wanted to point out.. that wasn't my intent. I think the only 'feature' reiser4 needs right now is mainstream inclusion. My ability to use it is severely hampered only being able to use it on boxes running test-kernel of the day.. which are laden with other issues unrelated to reiser4 that I don't have time to deal with.