From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Some questions about r4
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:19:35 -0400
Message-ID: <e692861c05090111192a7d9ea6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <431743196ebaa@wp.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25806-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <431743196ebaa@wp.pl>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Reiserfs List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On 9/1/05, Pysiak Satriani <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl> wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a r4-patch cooking for 2.6.13 ?
> Is the requirement for not enabling 4k-stacks going away soon?
> If I patch a vanilla kernel with r4, and sop using r4, would you say that=
 the changes I introduced by patching are rather safe to the rest of the ke=
rnel, or would you recomend going back to vanilla just in case?

On this point: 2.6.13 is out, is there going to be a pass at getting
reiser4 into 2.6.14?