From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:48:17 -0400
Message-ID: <e692861c0509061948391f5cbe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4317FD1B.504@namesys.com>
	 <Pine.GSO.4.44L.0509021620380.23379-100000@unix2.cc.ksu.edu>
	 <b14e81f005090318046ee67d7e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <431A5E43.4060005@slaphack.com> <431A6E71.4060105@namesys.com>
	 <20050906135951.GA12333@zero>
	 <b14e81f0050906133278ca728e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <431E21F5.2070703@namesys.com>
Reply-To: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25889-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <431E21F5.2070703@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: thenewme91@gmail.com, Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On 9/6/05, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
> Guys, I am sorry, but I just don't think this issue is a priority
> compared to other issues.  Sorry, too much else going on, honestly.

I'd say so:

Per Andrew Morton.=20

reiser4 merge status:
    Stuck.  Last time we discussed this I asked the reiser4 team to
    develop and negotiate a bullet-point list of things to be addressed.=20
    Once that's agreed to, implement it and then we can merge it.  None of
    that has happened and as far as I know, all the review feedback which
    was provided was lost.

:(