From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Maxwell Subject: Re: why does reiserfs list get so much spam? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:40:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <432A9BFD.10700@mch.one.pl> <20050916104129.GA11025@kruemel> <432AA409.5070006@interia.pl> <432AAA38.9000102@mch.one.pl> Reply-To: gmaxwell@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <432AAA38.9000102@mch.one.pl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Tomasz Chmielewski Cc: Grzegorz Kulewski , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On 9/16/05, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > yeah, but it is to be used by the end-user. >=20 > the archive will be still filled with spam. >=20 > not everyone who wants to know about reiser subscribes to the list; most > of the people would just use the archives. I actually subbed to the list because I was frustrated by spam in the archi= ve. Whomever runs the archive should at least just pipe it through spam assassin. If some legitimate messages are lost from the web archive it could not be worse than what we have now, an archive made nearly useless from excessive spam.