From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 5/5] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 10:26:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6ede505-e9a3-49a0-bfa5-e624c0aa7d6a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527153800.1557449-6-longman@redhat.com>
在 2026/5/27 23:38, Waiman Long 写道:
> With cgroup v2, the cgroup_taskset structure passed into the cgroup
> can_attach() and attach() methods can contain task migration data with
> multiple destination or source cpusets when the cpuset controller is
> enabled or disabled respectively.
...
> -/* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_mutex held */
> +/*
> + * Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cpuset_mutex held.
> + *
> + * With cgroup v2, enabling of cpuset controller in a cgroup subtree can
> + * cause @tset to contain task migration data from one parent cpuset to multiple
> + * child cpusets. Not much is needed to be done here other than tracking the
> + * number of DL tasks in each cpuset as the CPUs and memory nodes of the child
> + * cpusets are exactly the same as the parent.
> + *
> + * Conversely, disabling of cpuset controller can cause @tset to contain task
> + * migration data from multiple child cpusets to one parent cpuset. Here, the
> + * CPUs and memory nodes of the child cpusets may be different from the parent,
> + * but must be a subset of its parent.
> + *
> + * Another possible many-to-one migration is the moving of the whole
> + * multithreaded process with threads in different cpusets to another cpuset.
> + *
> + * For all other use cases, @tset task migration data should be from one source
> + * cpuset to one destination cpuset.
> + */
> static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
> {
> struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> @@ -3079,6 +3172,16 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, css, tset) {
> + struct cpuset *newcs = css_cs(css);
> + struct cpuset *new_oldcs = task_cs(task);
> +
> + if ((newcs != cs) || (new_oldcs != oldcs)) {
> + cs = newcs;
> + oldcs = new_oldcs;
> + ret = cpuset_can_attach_check(cs, oldcs, &setsched_check);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
Just a minor nit while running checkpatch --strict on this patch:
checkpatch reports unnecessary parentheses here:
if ((newcs != cs) || (new_oldcs != oldcs)) {
Perhaps this can be simplified to:
if (newcs != cs || new_oldcs != oldcs) {
> ret = task_can_attach(task);
> if (ret)
...
> /*
> * In the default hierarchy, enabling cpuset in the child cgroups
> - * will trigger a number of cpuset_attach() calls with no change
> - * in effective cpus and mems. In that case, we can optimize out
> - * by skipping the task iteration and update.
> + * will trigger a cpuset_attach() call with no change in effective cpus
> + * and mems. In that case, we can optimize out by skipping the task
> + * iteration and update, but the destination cpuset list is iterated to
> + * set old_mems_sllowed.
> */
I also noticed one small typo in the added comment:
s/old_mems_sllowed/old_mems_allowed/
Best,
Guopeng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 15:37 [PATCH-next v3 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-05-27 15:37 ` [PATCH-next v3 1/5] cgroup/cpuset: Add a cpuset_reserve_dl_bw() helper Waiman Long
2026-05-27 15:37 ` [PATCH-next v3 2/5] cgroup/cpuset: Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check() Waiman Long
2026-05-27 15:37 ` [PATCH-next v3 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: Made cpuset_attach_old_cs track task group leaders Waiman Long
2026-05-29 2:19 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-05-29 16:54 ` Waiman Long
2026-05-27 15:37 ` [PATCH-next v3 4/5] cgroup/cpuset: Move mpol_rebind_mm/cpuset_migrate_mm() calls inside cpuset_attach_task() Waiman Long
2026-05-29 2:21 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-05-27 15:38 ` [PATCH-next v3 5/5] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-05-29 2:26 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6ede505-e9a3-49a0-bfa5-e624c0aa7d6a@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.