From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08DF4CCA473 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:55:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UAVL7cvy2iNXRssxlWxfbXuNRdfEBbir7RGSZ3d42ms=; b=1qrEkIt9bet2l5 N+F0JGrlu41bUngp06NNM/dxozzj2Lj97o3B689lLlWJvNz3W5k90XXd/+o/kwX6ok8Kk5AujOzaw 9HdLatKvUltRHuBSsVtXUzUJtT6824uGmWtZbw6398FnM2W8dsy1Gej1jYUPv1VIx14UDrvlp30fN AvlGmpdynFuAQs5fZZGN2y8rcdukQKhG+e9bTqlin3io82Bn1KU1U2phXyAQ85v+4qpUKqOmg0zBe /EBxGWZRdy9IybwaNuTT3SPAiWqKk/ZL+WgmW72OFEs11obPNrU2SGr/ips4sgxtFI73IeDtgmFmt SYp4CBH1wTWWfUlvSUYg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nx9eN-0085Pk-F2; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:55:47 +0000 Received: from mga06b.intel.com ([134.134.136.31] helo=mga06.intel.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nx9eJ-0085Oa-Dk for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:55:45 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654271743; x=1685807743; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=blHQrZ0g94mMvLynPtoK8ncChfAm2Hug5DTS5ZrddFY=; b=eCj363LvKZlSMmpRrkXxB5BRQo4mT0wsPxM5hTkTV7g4dDYVppy8s4SE bDNwYQBok//290jG9GwKpiooxvCg1hw4l1DU7XIZPMzsfyz0iQf3vgROr S35gxFHzpMzMB3ryx9AJEqJ7JL4bg3jfmqwoOvjWEqOdAtfcdN3ufQM0a b4U16HmsxabWfekxU1hY1acvIJYGC5zLSVMEZcm6vAvXLYU3fZTzFt2Y9 3hF36Zw0s4VHePMhr3UK5qMTntvBQ3mu+qgPuISTXAkSGn4FY2SDnrZte HLnGrbwzjp1AGjAPpz6fY31OAWARk2FfnbkxHULf1ZgSe52XMM7MGRV85 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10367"; a="336942728" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,274,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="336942728" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2022 08:55:41 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,274,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="613323243" Received: from fbarati-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.24.19]) ([10.251.24.19]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2022 08:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:55:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan McDowell , Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Mimi Zohar , Dave Hansen , "x86@kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org References: <8634d4dd0813b9522f039ed211023c2c65c6f888.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220603_085543_628793_46E76D30 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.40 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 5/30/22 01:40, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Borislav, > > I don't think there are any outstanding review comments for me to deal > with on this, so is it safe to assume it'll get picked up at some point > once the merge window calms down? Nothing here looks too crazy, but it's still been _very_ lightly reviewed. It doesn't seem like anyone from the kexec world has seen it, for instance. Mimi's review was a great start, but it would be really nice to make sure that the kexec bits look good. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94367C43334 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237751AbiFCPzn (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:55:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57568 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231203AbiFCPzn (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:55:43 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75403BE04; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654271742; x=1685807742; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=blHQrZ0g94mMvLynPtoK8ncChfAm2Hug5DTS5ZrddFY=; b=CtJI9fgQDZorAHra/fjotVhBPOpocWYo7ZaQ3gYhAB4xVed+EOUqzAbq DRIIgqAQl/r2HHB6ckyeEn+WEe9jCyNi4dsHmpTW+nuJhCKMV8dHlF2ZH YE4Xc9P5ojNqt/IC7xyqmpaNscSmAWATRotnJnE71BnQ7/YUzP4Vcg3uI 1Saejw4A/8RxDKosn2QE7nNDWxV6wx6zzLpKnwVnF/V4Vw05OReNy5oUY lwNkWyL0P03a4fJuaP2JQxvvfAuG8bfepfuqkX97FPp+gp6h9qAo8Z17J pHtxnIDpygi6gO7YrnllDX7V47gmjxDg4VuA7bkvoQ2e/lpq10NrVKS1V Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10367"; a="362649491" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,274,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="362649491" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2022 08:55:42 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,274,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="613323243" Received: from fbarati-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.24.19]) ([10.251.24.19]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2022 08:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:55:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan McDowell , Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Mimi Zohar , Dave Hansen , "x86@kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org References: <8634d4dd0813b9522f039ed211023c2c65c6f888.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On 5/30/22 01:40, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Borislav, > > I don't think there are any outstanding review comments for me to deal > with on this, so is it safe to assume it'll get picked up at some point > once the merge window calms down? Nothing here looks too crazy, but it's still been _very_ lightly reviewed. It doesn't seem like anyone from the kexec world has seen it, for instance. Mimi's review was a great start, but it would be really nice to make sure that the kexec bits look good.