From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:55:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e78a9a19faf21349e81d47026e6fb180eba67e00.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803142907.1771509-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2026-08-03 at 16:29 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> v2:
>
> - Address potential zdev reference leak (false positive) by adding a
> comment, and moving get_zdev_by_fid() [Sashiko, Niklas]
>
> - Note: this reveals a pre-existing bug: zpci_remove_reserved_devices()
> calls zpci_device_reserved() without holding locks. It looks like
> this can be fixed easily by adding a mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock()
> pair in zpci_remove_reserved_devices(), but that is not within
> the scope of this series, and up to the pci maintainers
I agree with this assessment and can provide a patch on top of this
series to address this.
Thanks,
Niklas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 14:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS Heiko Carstens
2026-08-03 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] s390/pci: Rework __zpci_event_error() to remove conditional locking Heiko Carstens
2026-08-03 14:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:40 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-08-03 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] s390/pci: Rework__zpci_event_availability() " Heiko Carstens
2026-08-03 14:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:32 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-08-05 12:43 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-08-03 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS Heiko Carstens
2026-08-03 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 13:22 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-08-03 14:55 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e78a9a19faf21349e81d47026e6fb180eba67e00.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.