All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix unmatched id's under delayed path deletion
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:01:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e79a3ed5-e2ae-49f3-919c-735a2ff33358@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aaB6BJV3FvAVBuPq@kbusch-mbp>



On 2/26/26 10:21 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I find the retry logic a bit odd and different from other places
>> do in similar areas.  What I'd expected is either a "nr_retries" or
>> "did_retry" variable initialized to 0/false, then checked here to
>> be not set (plus the IS_ENABLED() for multipath) and incremented/set
>> below.
>>
>> But independent of that, the actual logic looks fine.
> 
> I was able to test this, and it does work when we're specifically
> blocking on the delayed removal. But there's a different race this
> doesn't handle: controller A's scan_work may depend on controller B's
> scan_work to finish first to remove a final reference on the deleted
> namespace when A is trying to add a newly created namespace that
> recycled the NSID.
> 
> This is looking pretty tricky to resolve. The best solution I'm coming
> up with so far is to have the scan_work synthesize a
> NVME_AER_NOTICE_NS_CHANGED event for every controller in the subsystem,
> then re-kick their scan work if the scan_work removed anything.

So does your disk when reuse NSID, changes ns ids such as NGUID/UUID/EUI64?

Thanks,
--Nilay


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25 20:21 [PATCH 1/2] nvme-multipath: fix leak on try_module_get failure Keith Busch
2026-02-25 20:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix unmatched id's under delayed path deletion Keith Busch
2026-02-25 20:34   ` Keith Busch
2026-02-26  7:04   ` Nilay Shroff
2026-02-26 15:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-26 16:51     ` Keith Busch
2026-02-26 18:31       ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-02-26 18:35         ` Keith Busch
2026-02-27 13:53           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-26  6:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-multipath: fix leak on try_module_get failure Nilay Shroff
2026-02-26  8:31 ` John Garry
2026-02-26 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-15  9:26 ` John Garry
2026-04-15 14:23   ` Keith Busch
2026-04-15 15:13     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e79a3ed5-e2ae-49f3-919c-735a2ff33358@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.