From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 10/18] perf/x86/intel: Allow LBR read helpers to operate on explicit stacks
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:05:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7bb28e7-cf1a-44b3-9ce9-3e6ab228d34f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029103857.GL1779021@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 10/29/2026 6:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 12:39:06PM +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> index ee724b28d90c..63f0504f9d2a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>> @@ -105,7 +105,10 @@
>>
>> #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK 0x7f000e
>>
>> -static void intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
>> +static void intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>> + struct perf_branch_stack *lbr_stack,
>> + struct perf_branch_entry *lbr_entries,
>> + u64 *lbr_counters);
>>
>> static __always_inline bool is_lbr_call_stack_bit_set(u64 config)
>> {
>> @@ -741,10 +744,12 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
>> +void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>> + struct perf_branch_stack *lbr_stack,
>> + struct perf_branch_entry *lbr_entries)
>> {
>> unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
>> - struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
>> + struct perf_branch_entry *br = lbr_entries;
>> u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -775,11 +780,13 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
>> * is the same as the linear address, allowing us to merge the LIP and EIP
>> * LBR formats.
>> */
>> -void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
>> +void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>> + struct perf_branch_stack *lbr_stack,
>> + struct perf_branch_entry *lbr_entries)
>> {
>> bool need_info = false, call_stack = false;
>> unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
>> - struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
>> + struct perf_branch_entry *br = lbr_entries;
>> u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
>> int i;
>> int out = 0;
> This makes no sense; why do you keep passing lbr_entries around when we
> have lbr_stack.entries[] ?
Yeah, that's actually what I did at the beginning. But sashiko raised the
warning below. :(
"
Does this trigger a CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS panic when intel_pmu_store_lbr()
is inlined?
The lbr_stack pointer points to a struct
perf_branch_stack embedded directly in struct cpu_hw_events. Because it
is an embedded value-type struct, the compiler considers its size to be
fixed (16 bytes), treating the trailing flexible array member entries[]
as having 0 elements.
Accessing lbr_stack->entries[i] where i >= 0 can trigger strict array
bounds violations under -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 and CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS.
"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 4:38 [Patch v5 00/18] perf/x86: Fix multiple LBR sampling issues Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:38 ` [Patch v5 01/18] perf/x86: Disable LBR if x86_pmu.lbr_nr exceeds MAX_LBR_ENTRIES Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-29 9:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-30 0:45 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 4:38 ` [Patch v5 02/18] perf/x86/intel: Validate LBR XSAVE state before updating LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 9:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-29 10:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 4:38 ` [Patch v5 03/18] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 04/18] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 05/18] perf/x86: Add lbr_enabled to track LBR state Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 06/18] perf/x86/amd: Avoid re-enabling PMU and LBR for BPF when disabled Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 07/18] perf/x86/intel: Add helper to enable PMU without LBR Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 08/18] perf/x86/intel: Avoid re-enabling PMU and LBR for BPF when disabled Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 09/18] perf/x86/intel: Keep LBR frozen throughout PMI handling Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-30 0:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 10/18] perf/x86/intel: Allow LBR read helpers to operate on explicit stacks Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-30 1:05 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 11/18] perf/x86/intel: Use a dedicated LBR stack for BPF snapshotting Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-30 1:44 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 12/18] perf/x86/intel: Always snapshot live hardware LBR state for BPF Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-30 1:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 13/18] perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events if needed Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-30 1:54 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 14/18] perf/x86/intel: Account arch-PEBS in lbr_pebs_users Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 15/18] perf/x86/intel: Clear raw LBR counters in the LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 16/18] perf/x86/intel: Refill LBR stack for LBR counter events in PMI handler Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 5:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 17/18] perf/x86/intel: Pass LBR stack size into store_lbr() Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 4:39 ` [Patch v5 18/18] perf/core: Don't overwrite shared LBR stack depth Dapeng Mi
2026-10-29 4:57 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7bb28e7-cf1a-44b3-9ce9-3e6ab228d34f@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.