From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, josef@toxicopanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>,
ameryhung@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 2/4] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:38:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e864121c-f5ad-4df3-b956-f412632db3fb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47611e3e8a2bfbdce1dfd9a1fe2c5019@kernel.org>
Hello Tejun,
在 2026/10/17 01:49, Tejun Heo 写道:
> Hello, Tao.
>
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2026 20:40:43 +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
>> + dev = getenv("IOCOST_TEST_DEV");
>
> Nothing in the tree sets IOCOST_TEST_DEV, so both tests always skip in CI.
> The null_blk instance the v11 removal test creates could serve these two
> as well.
>
Right, that was an oversight. All three tests now create their own
null_blk instance through configfs. The create/remove helpers from the
removal test are shared, the $IOCOST_TEST_DEV handling is gone, and
everything now runs in CI.
>> + if (ASSERT_OK(err, "readback"))
>> + ASSERT_EQ(strcmp(model, "bpf"), 0, "model_bpf");
>
> ASSERT_STREQ() prints both strings on failure.
>
Switched.
>> + bpf_link__destroy(skel->links.iocost_2x);
>> + /* cleared, or the skeleton destroy below detaches again */
>> + skel->links.iocost_2x = NULL;
>
> Without clearing, the skeleton destroy would call bpf_link__destroy() on
> the freed link. It wouldn't detach again.
>
Good catch. The comment now says the link has already been destroyed
and the field is cleared so iocost_model__destroy() doesn't try to
destroy it again.
>> + * The cursor handling follows the builtin: a zero cursor means "no
>> + * previous IO", and the cursor is advanced for bios the builtin
>> + * prices (READ/WRITE with a non-zero size; the builtin skips the
>> + * whole update when the cost is zero), so flushes and discards
>> + * leave it alone and long merged streams do not drift past the
>> + * 16MB seek threshold.
>
> The model advances the cursor for every merged READ or WRITE bio.
> ioc_rqos_merge() only moves it on a back merge into the request ending at
> the cursor, so a front merge leaves the builtin's cursor alone and moves
> the model's.
>
Fixed; the example model now moves the cursor the way
ioc_rqos_merge() moves the builtin's, so front merges leave it alone.
>> + } else {
>> + base = randio;
>> + for (i = 1; i < NSLOTS; i++) {
>> + if (s->stamp[i] < s->stamp[victim])
>> + victim = i;
>> + }
>
> A merged bio which matches no slot, e.g. a front merge or a merge into
> another stream's request, takes the LRU slot and can evict a live stream.
> Maybe skip the slot replacement for IOCOST_COST_F_MERGE?
>
Agreed; a merged bio which matches no slot is now priced without
touching the table, so a merge can no longer evict a live stream.
Thanks,
Tao
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-03 12:40 [RFC PATCH v10 0/4] blk-iocost: add BPF struct_ops cost model support Tao Cui
2026-10-03 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH v10 1/4] " Tao Cui
2026-10-03 13:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-03 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 20:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-19 9:27 ` Tao Cui
2026-10-03 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH v10 2/4] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test Tao Cui
2026-10-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-19 9:38 ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-10-03 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH v10 3/4] blk-iocost: add iocost_ioc_tick tracepoint for per-period device summary Tao Cui
2026-10-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-19 9:44 ` Tao Cui
2026-10-03 12:40 ` [RFC PATCH v10 4/4] docs: cgroup-v2: document the iocost BPF cost model attachment Tao Cui
2026-10-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-19 9:50 ` Tao Cui
2026-10-15 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH v10 0/4] blk-iocost: add BPF struct_ops cost model support Tao Cui
2026-10-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-19 8:47 ` Tao Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e864121c-f5ad-4df3-b956-f412632db3fb@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@toxicopanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.