From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me_Pouiller?= Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:17:31 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build failures In-Reply-To: <20130828090812.43a7f849@skate> References: <20130828063005.74A7952C1BE@lolut.humanoidz.org> <20130828090812.43a7f849@skate> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On 2013-08-28 09:08, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: [...] >> x86_64 | strongswan-5.0.4 | NOK | >> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a637f916962b6136dd6dd4f4b9ff4e1cab568ef3/ > > utils/backtrace.c:23:23: fatal error: execinfo.h: No such file or > directory > > uClibc doesn't have execinfo.h by default. Proper testing should be > added in strongswan code. J?r?me, can you have a look at this? I track down this error for some time but I can't reproduce it. There is a test in ./configure that disable inclusion of execinfo.h if backtrace() is not found. When re-run autobuilder configuration, this check is correctly executed and execinfo.h is not included. Is anyone else can reproduce it? [...] -- J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic Embedded Linux specialist http://www.sysmic.fr