From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com (mx.kolabnow.com [212.103.80.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C66A92F for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.103.80.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719415921; cv=none; b=q67OwYT26Ttp81saFJ7tHbO0Pxmp7HeCL21e+ClrsgzgCwC+2Ok0lr88TaLNBq6Xl8idNvHTQDuelfrTlsgeklsnzzKlF82Hgkal9Hzac1fXjEPuyDL9CnsTgjbqvGSOUAgLdiusDjmQfVOD3SdK8xXHS57vMsVKr8LRZZbuzj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719415921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l2b8ZyapOcH2oqMP3Me88Rj4ZBEEEBUBCqUc2+772iI=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=cWtr97SXSu1zQ9PKvS6lDENnl2nZcatxQ+21ELSmI+yisiKTkQAXd4z1vqIWsdi8RYc0x6CxEiixklinEw3rP7mxwKXMyVKA9tKmUqAMO4NNsvoptNrYRrjmqIoJJlSd0hvKuXqhVfrmJodpXcFezm1f09UZTo7lMgGNaMRvg5k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vaga.pv.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vaga.pv.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kolabnow.com header.i=@kolabnow.com header.b=Rv5HZc0r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.103.80.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vaga.pv.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vaga.pv.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kolabnow.com header.i=@kolabnow.com header.b="Rv5HZc0r" Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F4D20D136E; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:31:49 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com (amavis); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=kolabnow.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:message-id :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :mime-version:received:received:received; s=dkim20240523; t= 1719415904; x=1721230305; bh=G5X5CaV+LzeUtcFjtuAhzHUHRZc+gQiWQCV u+A0+3pE=; b=Rv5HZc0ryApMNmAcnbu56vBchoOk0rXdtQuFFCBSbGO9+lsRS9V UFZOnxdt9nnh/68zcEPMED7fYBeFCibnZXLgdLRvWTllvqUr07hHpNXu11pj65Jk mGPpG5Q8gcictDE6p8mDQDuaCuT0+K/T5Wew8YGYqrnd0xImjPw+WvJKqSJBJEI+ DycGljTw7OxU6kcSHgkUjtD1DHd4xbftWqofwoqRbiY5S1DqarzgqzkXh2ZMyQFQ 2OeeZCuVpCUFPXJxPl+st+n8JW9d1q7W8uxNdK66/EUEZnPl0myhquC0DA2eC2Lw IBt0AQj8MT2SqIvhXSgJ4OS/Pa4Mp97330Q== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.999 X-Spam-Level: Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out011.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9CGeMoq7R0m; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx009.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.9]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0267620D1358; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:31:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-subm015.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.37.15]) by int-mx009.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709EA21F4E6E; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:31:43 +0200 (CEST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:31:43 +0200 From: Federico Vaga To: Thorsten Scherer Cc: Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc:it_IT: Fix typo in Reviewed-by tag In-Reply-To: <20240625210455.13262-1-t.scherer@eckelmann.de> References: <20240625210455.13262-1-t.scherer@eckelmann.de> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit You are right, thank you for the patch On 2024-06-25 23:04, Thorsten Scherer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Scherer > --- > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git > a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst > b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst > index a83fcfe18024..b3d8b62f3b57 100644 > --- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst > +++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ all'ABI dello spazio utente, eccetera. Qualunque > tipo di revisione è ben > accetta e di valore, se porta ad avere un codice migliore nel kernel. > > Non esistono requisiti particolarmente stringenti per l'uso di > etichette come > -``Reviewd-by``. Tuttavia, perché la revisione sia efficace ci si > aspetta un > +``Reviewed-by``. Tuttavia, perché la revisione sia efficace ci si > aspetta un > qualche tipo di messaggio che dica "ho verificato A, B e C nel codice > che è > appena stato inviato e mi sembra tutto in ordine". Inoltre, questo > permette ai > manutentori di prendere conoscenza circa una revisione avvenuta per > davvero. -- Federico Vaga http://www.federicovaga.it/