From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D898C61DD6 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D78605FD; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBLHQsqqDySq; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=buildroot.org; s=default; t=1788022334; bh=lepDyxvc0lcJnwgAjMYWjWuUbt404JceLf9NZYRFZVg=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=K6xUkMZe1afaSMeV3sDmWfD/RVvPkm+xHOSbBLp4A/3Yft1UkYxAAciZWxhNzrqtT dwJQaFt/kCjSY8Ziv5VO6TTMYLoP4P47nFlTzaF5McxRlm6PjnYzVocQfsaooSSon2 WeRJEmts2RD/SToSSULARQe5D5Cq7WIXIOn9OXJP3sUd7FJfC3peWImeaulElzDUzA 78SfBOLslwWuLQYxqNqrpA+6l0+7N8FfCD8+7O93DTAEhFxkX3YjQk/BNPOvmbWS7j MrPcG1ioqsemiHcMcnMmJCVYhsts6cI2y+Pf1bBiA3Yz6WD04fiGS9J3DZshvu7UzF 265a9fBZ4l90A== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9523605F3; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCD6355 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CC040669 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id NtzlFJm5cYmY for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.27.42.6; helo=smtp6-g21.free.fr; envelope-from=ju.o@free.fr; receiver= Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 009794072E for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.free.fr (unknown [172.20.246.1]) (Authenticated sender: ju.o@free.fr) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6461A780331; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 18:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 2a0d:e487:118f:32f7:a07:17e2:1c81:e739 via 2a0d:e487:118f:32f7:a07:17e2:1c81:e739 by webmail.free.fr with HTTP (HTTP/1.0 POST); Sat, 29 Aug 2026 18:52:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 18:52:08 +0200 To: Peter Korsgaard Cc: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot , Thomas Petazzoni In-Reply-To: <8733vxypoh.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20260827095520.1049186-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20260827095520.1049186-3-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <8733vxypoh.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Webmail Free/1.6.18 Message-ID: X-Sender: ju.o@free.fr Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] support/testing: add bpftrace test X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Julien Olivain via buildroot Reply-To: Julien Olivain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi Peter, Thomas, On 29/08/2026 16:19, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot >>>>>> writes: > > > This commit adds a simple bpftrace test that ensures that not only > it > > builds fine, but it also runs properly on a minimal test scenario. > > > + config = f""" > > + BR2_aarch64=y > > + BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y > > + BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_GETTY_PORT="ttyAMA0" > > + BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y > > + BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_VERSION=y > > + BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_VERSION_VALUE="6.6.32" > > Any specific reason to use such an old kernel? The qemu_aarch64_virt > defconfig uses a 6.18 kernel. Is it to match the default ARM 15.2 > external toolchain? If so, that one is built against 6.6.44. > > cat > output/host/usr/aarch64-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/linux/version.h > #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 394796 > #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + ((c) > 255 ? > 255 : (c))) > #define LINUX_VERSION_MAJOR 6 > #define LINUX_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 6 > #define LINUX_VERSION_SUBLEVEL 44 I initially had the same question. Then, I assumed this new runtime test has been simply copied from the existing test_bcc: https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/blob/master/support/testing/tests/package/test_bcc.py which was written with kernel 6.6.32, which was the latest LTS at that time. Once the next 2026.08 release will be complete, I think we will do a cleanup in runtime tests, to add a Aarch64 builtin kernel at the latest LTS. So all those runtime tests will be updated. > -- > Bye, Peter Korsgaard Best regards, Julien. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot