From: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
To: bitflipper <forums@bitflipper.net>
Cc: "Yocto (yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org)" <yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org>
Subject: RE: [yocto] Bitbake + Patches
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:01:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaa317a217a44ebaac9e3044b5c4907d@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60D6BF68-443E-410E-88AC-B10C17DD46C6@bitflipper.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11230 bytes --]
Sorry for not responding earlier. I do not read this list regularly.
The values I supplied for the suggested bbappend all come from the version of the apache2 recipe that is on master of the openembedded repository.
If you change the version from 2.4.54 to 2.4.52, then yes, you will have to change the checksums as well to match. It also means that you may need to apply other patches (based on what the recipe for apache2 looks like on the Honister branch).
Looking at your error messages below, they refer to a recipe called “smith-nephew-cp-lwb5”. I do not know what that is (though the version matches apache2’s…)
//Peter
From: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org <yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of bitflipper
Sent: den 30 augusti 2022 00:06
To: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Cc: Yocto (yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org) <yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] Bitbake + Patches
Peter, so here’s my current bbappend file for Apache 2.4.52 which is included with honester:
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${BPN}:”
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=bddeddfac80b2c9a882241d008bb41c3”
PV = <file://LICENSE;md5=bddeddfac80b2c9a882241d008bb41c3”%0b%0b %20PV%20=%20> “2.4.52"
SRC_URI += "file://0008-Fix-perl-install-directory-to-usr-bin.patch \
file://0009-support-apxs.in-force-destdir-to-be-empty-string.patch \
file://0001-make_exports.awk-not-expose-the-path.patch”
SRC_URI_remove = "file://apache-configure_perlbin.patch”
SRC_URI[md5sum] = <file://apache-configure_perlbin.patch”%0b%0b %20SRC_URI[md5sum]%20=%20> “861b43073ab416d689f1fc4dfa087711"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = “eb397feeefccaf254f8d45de3768d9d68e8e73851c49afd5b7176d1ecf80c340”
And the current build error:
ERROR: smith-nephew-cp-lwb5-2.4.52-r0 do_populate_lic: QA Issue: smith-nephew-cp-lwb5: LIC_FILES_CHKSUM points to an invalid file: /ct/yocto/imx- 5.4.70/build/tmp/work/imx6ulevk-poky-linux-gnueabi/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5/2.4.52-r0/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5-2.4.52/LICENSE [license-checksum]
ERROR: smith-nephew-cp-lwb5-2.4.52-r0 do_populate_lic: Fatal QA errors found, failing task.
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /ct/yocto/imx-5.4.70/build/tmp/work/imx6ulevk-poky-linux-gnueabi/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5/2.4.52-r0/temp/log.do_populate_lic.1463178
ERROR: Task (/ct/yocto/imx-5.4.70/sources/meta-laird-cp/recipes-packages/images/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5.bb:do_populate_lic) failed with exit code ‘1’
My gut feeling is that the SRC_URI[mdtsum] and SRC_URI[sha256sum] and out of whack because I needed to switch from 2.4.54 to 2.4.52 of apache. You supplied the SRC_URI[sha256sum] based on a 2.4.54 version of Apache? and I filled in the SRC_URI[md5sum] based on what bitable told me it should be. If you can tell me how to get the correct SRC_URI[sha256sum] for apache 2.4.52 I think I can get past this error.
Thanks, Jim
> On Aug 29, 2022, at 4:06 PM, forums <forums@bitflipper.net<mailto:forums@bitflipper.net>> wrote:
>
> Peter, I think I know what caused the Error. I think apache 2.4.52 will be sufficient for our current needs.
>
> I have subsequently changed the PV to 2.4.52. But that LC_FILES_CHKSUM is still generating the same build error. How did you get the MD5 Checksum? If you can tell me which file you took it form that would be helpful and I can go and get that MD5 sum from Honiker tree — whatever file it was that I should get it from.
>
>
> Thanks, Jim
>
>
>> On Aug 29, 2022, at 3:34 PM, bitflipper <forums@bitflipper.net<mailto:forums@bitflipper.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Peter, I plugging in the bbappend as is except for the md5sumthat was spit out by the yocto build. Here’s my bbappend file:
>>
>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${BPN}:”
>>
>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=bddeddfac80b2c9a882241d008bb41c3”
>>
>> PV = <file://LICENSE;md5=bddeddfac80b2c9a882241d008bb41c3”%0b%3e%3e%20%0b%3e%3e %20PV%20=%20> “2.4.54"
>>
>> SRC_URI += "file://0008-Fix-perl-install-directory-to-usr-bin.patch \
>> file://0009-support-apxs.in-force-destdir-to-be-empty-string.patch \
>> file://0001-make_exports.awk-not-expose-the-path.patch”
>> SRC_URI_remove = "file://apache-configure_perlbin.patch”
>>
>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = <file://apache-configure_perlbin.patch”%0b%3e%3e%20%0b%3e%3e %20SRC_URI[md5sum]%20=%20> "<861b43073ab416d689f1fc4dfa087711>”
>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eb397feeefccaf254f8d45de3768d9d68e8e73851c49afd5b7176d1ecf80c340"
>>
>>
>> When I run bitable, I get the following error:
>>
>>
>>
>> ERROR: smith-nephew-cp-lwb5-2.4.54-r0 do_populate_lic: QA Issue: smith-nephew-cp-lwb5: LIC_FILES_CHKSUM points to an invalid file: /ct/yocto/imx-5.4.70/build/tmp/work/imx6ulevk-poky-linux-gnueabi/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5/2.4.54-r0/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5-2.4.54/LICENSE [license-checksum]
>> ERROR: smith-nephew-cp-lwb5-2.4.54-r0 do_populate_lic: Fatal QA errors found, failing task.
>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /ct/yocto/imx-5.4.70/build/tmp/work/imx6ulevk-poky-linux-gnueabi/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5/2.4.54-r0/temp/log.do_populate_lic.1455644
>> ERROR: Task (/ct/yocto/imx-5.4.70/sources/meta-laird-cp/recipes-packages/images/smith-nephew-cp-lwb5.bb:do_populate_lic) failed with exit code '1'
>>
>>
>> I’m suspecting its something to do with the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ??
>>
>> Any input appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Jim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 28, 2022, at 10:49 PM, bitflipper <forums@bitflipper.net<mailto:forums@bitflipper.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Peter. In my mind this process is starting to come together as to why is happening. So I copied the bbappend file as is and I did get the error your expected that I would about the md5sum:
>>>
>>>
>>> ERROR: apache2-2.4.54-r0 do_fetch: Checksum failure fetching https://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.54.tar.bz2
>>> ERROR: apache2-2.4.54-r0 do_fetch: Fetcher failure for URL: 'https://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.54.tar.bz2'. Checksum mismatch!
>>> File: '/ct/yocto/imx-5.4.70/downloads/httpd-2.4.54.tar.bz2' has md5 checksum 861b43073ab416d689f1fc4dfa087711 when <I don't have this at hand, but bitbake will tell you what it should be> was expected
>>> If this change is expected (e.g. you have upgraded to a new version without updating the checksums) then you can use these lines within the recipe:
>>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "861b43073ab416d689f1fc4dfa087711"
>>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eb397feeefccaf254f8d45de3768d9d68e8e73851c49afd5b7176d1ecf80c340"
>>> Otherwise you should retry the download and/or check with upstream to determine if the file has become corrupted or otherwise unexpectedly modified.
>>>
>>> But then I don’t understand what needs to be done with what you said here:
>>>
>>>>> You then also need to copy the three new patches and any other
>>>>> patches that differs between zeus and master and put them in your
>>>>> layer together with the bbappend file (in a subdirectory called
>>>>> "recipes-httpd/apache2/apache2”)
>>>
>>>
>>> My assumption here is that I need to copy the difference between the Zeus and Master recipe for apache2 and place them in a file here;
>>>
>>> recipies-httpd/apache2/apache2
>>>
>>> The name of the file will be apache2 and it will contain the diffs between Zeus and Master for the apache2 recipes. And the diff are from the following file:
>>>
>>> ./sources/meta-openembedded/meta-webserver/recipes-httpd/apache2/apache2_2.4.41.bb
>>>
>>> Right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Aug 26, 2022, at 10:03 AM, Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com<mailto:peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [ In the future, please make sure to reply to list and not just to me. ]
>>>> [ Top posting since Outlook doesn’t support inline responses to HTML mails. ]
>>>>
>>>> No, you are supposed to copy the suggest text for the bbappend verbatim, with the exception of the SRC_URI[md5sum] which need to be corrected to match the actual MD5 sum (which bitbake will tell you when you try to build). The suggested additions/deletions for SRC_URI in the bbappend I suggested should be correct as specified, based on the differences between the apache2 recipe in Zeus and master. You will also need to copy the three new patch files from master of meta-webserver, and any of the other patches that have been updated between Zeus and master. Changing PV takes care of the actual update of the code to the new version (since it determines which tar ball is fetched from upstream).
>>>>
>>>> //Peter
>>>>
>>>> From: forums <forums@bitflipper.net<mailto:forums@bitflipper.net>>
>>>> Sent: den 26 augusti 2022 14:21
>>>> To: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com<mailto:peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Bitbake + Patches
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${BPN}:"
>>>>
>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=bddeddfac80b2c9a882241d008bb41c3"
>>>>
>>>> PV = "2.4.54"
>>>>
>>>> SRC_URI += "file://0008-Fix-perl-install-directory-to-usr-bin.patch \
>>>> file://0009-support-apxs.in-force-destdir-to-be-empty-string.patch \
>>>> file://0001-make_exports.awk-not-expose-the-path.patch"
>>>> SRC_URI_remove = "file://apache-configure_perlbin.patch"
>>>>
>>>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "<I don't have this at hand, but bitbake will tell you what it should be>"
>>>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "eb397feeefccaf254f8d45de3768d9d68e8e73851c49afd5b7176d1ecf80c340"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> H Peter. I have t admin, looking at the above bbappend, its really confusing to me. I’ve looked at some of the documents on bitbake and I just can’t find anything to teach me how to put a bbappend together to accomplish upgrading an application.
>>>>
>>>> Like for example:
>>>>
>>>> SRC_URI += "file://0008-Fix-perl-install-directory-to-usr-bin.patch
>>>>
>>>> I believe this one should be:
>>>>
>>>> SRC_URI += file:/usr/bin/patch
>>>>
>>>> The next one:
>>>>
>>>> file://0009-support-apxs.in-force-destdir-to-be-empty-string.patch
>>>>
>>>> I’ve no idea what this one will nee to be.
>>>>
>>>> And this one:
>>>>
>>>> file://0001-make_exports.awk-not-expose-the-path.patch
>>>>
>>>> I don’t know what is supposed to go here either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then the SRC_URI_remove will be a pointer to the file containing the patches containing the diff’e between apache 12.4.1 and apache 2.4.54 ? I don’t think you can create a single patch file containing diff’s between multiple versions can you? I think it would have to be diff’s between apache 2.4.41 and 2.4.42. Right. Totally confused as to what to do here.
>>>>
>>>> Any further help appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> If you know of a resource for me to reference please pass it on. I just don’t see any clear documentation that explains how to construct a bbappend file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Jim
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 20022 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-06 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 20:54 Bitbake + Patches forums
2022-08-22 22:29 ` [yocto] " Khem Raj
2022-08-23 11:41 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
[not found] ` <B58205E1-72E9-41F6-9A52-A440A62C3C6B@bitflipper.net>
2022-08-24 14:13 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
[not found] ` <0C54FD2B-AEAB-4425-9CEB-FFCA85458A16@bitflipper.net>
2022-08-26 14:03 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2022-08-29 2:49 ` forums
[not found] ` <170FB0FB9A5D94E8.11791@lists.yoctoproject.org>
2022-08-29 19:34 ` forums
[not found] ` <170FE7D455D5B425.21714@lists.yoctoproject.org>
2022-08-29 20:06 ` forums
2022-08-29 22:06 ` forums
2022-09-06 18:01 ` Peter Kjellerstedt [this message]
2022-08-30 20:22 ` Randy MacLeod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eaa317a217a44ebaac9e3044b5c4907d@axis.com \
--to=peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com \
--cc=forums@bitflipper.net \
--cc=yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.