All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Liu, Shaoyun" <Shaoyun.Liu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"amd-gfx list
	(amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org)"
	<amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
	"Deucher,
	Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: brahma_sw_dev <brahma_sw_dev-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Move kiq ring lock out of virt strucure
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:41:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eacb1673-75ab-2cc8-87f2-ce2beef861eb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR12MB1179284CC4DD50F4D0DDF85DF4130-2J9CzHegvk8p/eksZXEfgQdYzm3356FpvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>

I actually have a similar patch in my tree at the moment.

Only a minor nitpick (the original base also has the same problem). Can 
you rename 'lock_ring' to  'ring_mutex'? Usually the _lock suffix is 
used for spinlock_t and _mutex is used for mutexes.

With that fixed you can add:
Reviewed-by: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>

Regards,
Andres

On 2017-04-28 05:26 PM, Liu, Shaoyun wrote:
> From c520110807459bdd3fa4d6c86b2f2ab291051ebc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Shaoyun Liu <Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:18:26 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Move kiq ring lock out of virt structure
>
> The usage of kiq should not depend on the virtualization.
>
> Change-Id: I39a439383b0c48d8f410cd362325b8404382cd53
> Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h      | 1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 9 ++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h | 1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c    | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c    | 2 ++
>  5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> index e330009..dbd0cb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> @@ -909,6 +909,7 @@ struct amdgpu_mec {
>  struct amdgpu_kiq {
>  	u64			eop_gpu_addr;
>  	struct amdgpu_bo	*eop_obj;
> +	struct mutex		lock_ring;
>  	struct amdgpu_ring	ring;
>  	struct amdgpu_irq_src	irq;
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> index 1363239..4da15e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ void amdgpu_virt_init_setting(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>  	adev->cg_flags = 0;
>  	adev->pg_flags = 0;
>
> -	mutex_init(&adev->virt.lock_kiq);
>  	mutex_init(&adev->virt.lock_reset);
>  }
>
> @@ -122,12 +121,12 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_virt_kiq_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg)
>
>  	BUG_ON(!ring->funcs->emit_rreg);
>
> -	mutex_lock(&adev->virt.lock_kiq);
> +	mutex_lock(&kiq->lock_ring);
>  	amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
>  	amdgpu_ring_emit_rreg(ring, reg);
>  	amdgpu_fence_emit(ring, &f);
>  	amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
> -	mutex_unlock(&adev->virt.lock_kiq);
> +	mutex_unlock(&kiq->lock_ring);
>
>  	r = fence_wait(f, false);
>  	if (r)
> @@ -148,12 +147,12 @@ void amdgpu_virt_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v)
>
>  	BUG_ON(!ring->funcs->emit_wreg);
>
> -	mutex_lock(&adev->virt.lock_kiq);
> +	mutex_lock(&kiq->lock_ring);
>  	amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
>  	amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, v);
>  	amdgpu_fence_emit(ring, &f);
>  	amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
> -	mutex_unlock(&adev->virt.lock_kiq);
> +	mutex_unlock(&kiq->lock_ring);
>
>  	r = fence_wait(f, false);
>  	if (r)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
> index a8ed162..6f2b7df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ struct amdgpu_virt {
>  	uint64_t			csa_vmid0_addr;
>  	bool chained_ib_support;
>  	uint32_t			reg_val_offs;
> -	struct mutex			lock_kiq;
>  	struct mutex                    lock_reset;
>  	struct amdgpu_irq_src		ack_irq;
>  	struct amdgpu_irq_src		rcv_irq;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> index ac64e01..d649479 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> @@ -1385,6 +1385,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kiq_init_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  	struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
>  	int r = 0;
>
> +	mutex_init(&kiq->lock_ring);
> +
>  	r = amdgpu_wb_get(adev, &adev->virt.reg_val_offs);
>  	if (r)
>  		return r;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> index 08daa3f..9b68d33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> @@ -615,6 +615,8 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_kiq_init_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  	struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
>  	int r = 0;
>
> +	mutex_init(&kiq->lock_ring);
> +
>  	r = amdgpu_wb_get(adev, &adev->virt.reg_val_offs);
>  	if (r)
>  		return r;
> -- 1.9.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28 21:26 Move kiq ring lock out of virt strucure Liu, Shaoyun
     [not found] ` <DM5PR12MB1179284CC4DD50F4D0DDF85DF4130-2J9CzHegvk8p/eksZXEfgQdYzm3356FpvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-28 21:41   ` Andres Rodriguez [this message]
     [not found]     ` <eacb1673-75ab-2cc8-87f2-ce2beef861eb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-28 21:54       ` Liu, Shaoyun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eacb1673-75ab-2cc8-87f2-ce2beef861eb@gmail.com \
    --to=andresx7-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Shaoyun.Liu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=brahma_sw_dev-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.