From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>,
thuth@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jrossi@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, iii@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_load_segment function
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:48:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ead03e08-4121-4636-bbdf-77572f42e9f7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <310f1563-e04a-4aa2-aed1-ee631676c4a0@linux.ibm.com>
[...]
>>> @@ -662,6 +661,9 @@ static int zipl_load_segment(ComponentEntry *entry)
>>> */
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + comp_len += bprs->size * (bprs[i].blockct + 1);
>>> +
>>
>> I'm confused by the arithmetic here. Why is size multiplied by the
>> block count? Won't that artificially inflate the value representing the
>> size of the component? What's the reason that comp_len += bprs->size
>> isn't sufficient?
>>
>
> A component table entry points to a segment table, which holds pointers
> to code segments loaded into contiguous memory.
>
> Since segments can vary in length, the block count field may be nonzero.
>
> Block size indicates the number of bytes in a single logical block, so
> the total component size is the block size multiplied by the block count.
>
Okay. After referencing both your explanation and our disk layout docs,
this makes more sense to me. Thanks!
More nitpicking: I think it reads better to put this line of code as the
last line of the for loop. That will keep all disk-reading code
together and make it a little more clear that this variable isn't used
elsewhere in the inner loop.
Functionally, I think the patch is fine :)
[...]
--
Regards,
Collin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 21:10 [PATCH v4 00/28] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 01/28] Add boot-certificates to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 15:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 03/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 04/28] s390x: Guest support for Certificate Store Facility (CS) Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-21 21:30 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-23 20:15 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 05/28] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for certificate store facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-21 21:26 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-21 21:39 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-22 21:08 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-23 17:50 ` Eric Farman
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 06/28] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 07/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-23 20:17 ` Eric Farman
2025-07-28 22:01 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-23 22:15 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-23 22:20 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 08/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/28] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-28 20:59 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-29 18:18 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-29 18:56 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/28] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:26 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 12/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 13/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 14/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 15/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 16/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Set iplb->len to maximum length of " Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 17/28] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 20:33 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 18/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 20:53 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 19/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 22:10 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-15 15:59 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-15 21:48 ` Collin Walling [this message]
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 20/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 22:50 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-14 14:54 ` Jared Rossi
2025-07-14 15:34 ` Thomas Huth
2025-07-14 17:46 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-21 21:50 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-28 21:05 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 21/28] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 22:13 ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 22/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 23/28] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 24/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 25/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 26/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:28 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 27/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 28/28] docs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-21 19:13 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ead03e08-4121-4636-bbdf-77572f42e9f7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.