From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: use out-of-line GIT logo. Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:21:39 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <20060730223839.GB16364@admingilde.org> <20060731035904.53458.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 31 07:21:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7QDm-0007Nu-Dw for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:21:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751486AbWGaFVj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:21:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751491AbWGaFVj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:21:39 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:64956 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751486AbWGaFVi (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:21:38 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1G7QDb-0007MF-Qi for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:21:31 +0200 Received: from 193.0.122.19 ([193.0.122.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:21:31 +0200 Received: from jnareb by 193.0.122.19 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:21:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.0.122.19 Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov wrote: > --- Martin Waitz wrote: > >> Use the normal web server instead of the CGI to provide the git logo, >> just like the gitweb.css. > > NACK. I'd really rather keep the logo (which is essential) in the > file itself. This would mean one less file to worry about. I'm not sure. On the one hand this introduces yet another file which we have to worry about, on the other it probably help performance. Any hard numbers? The difference with gitweb.css is that you edit gitweb.css, and that inclused CSS can be cached; we could probably do the same trick like with logo (i.e. embed it in gitweb.css, but still use and not Besides, mixed language files are hard to syntax highlight correctly... -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git