From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MCJQ/zRKtRl56XkczIBrW+g5PgIuFnUZJqqBfsa+bb8=; b=ZCKDmmYFRCE1IAJOvVixba1t+yG9O7FRBY9XszxUSpHPjNTCS82Fd2SR4MyWpJepsa gSBviTvX9UjQHXdaJTTLU1VENkHkRY/tG5PRMUFBBKeoKeaUXwS4w+OpRCGk7/TtMKnD L0HGVKsBntLuHJp/9vaKxcky1zMc6Pt+ZZj/tRH9dA0vNvmFBYpH/pPDBkuVhsyi4iaY op2U8C3dbv13tMEry2LPCPfGEktUwvhYHiZ3O2jyu0hVy+UzK4oRzSH65qdFX8qvyZLy VnjA8kW34HZucgDWRfKPxGM49upCUqOKdFXeeVuRlQC2liiDxRnnTwyqHKjGCsnPLwXf 7TsQ== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 19:08:05 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [PATCH -perfbook 3/4] cpu: Add page reference to Table E.1 in QQz 3.8 Content-Language: en-US References: <8f565979-bba0-bab1-7c8e-ebc76c2b4e65@gmail.com> From: Akira Yokosawa In-Reply-To: <8f565979-bba0-bab1-7c8e-ebc76c2b4e65@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Paul E. McKenney" , Leonardo Bras Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa List-ID: Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa --- cpu/overheads.tex | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/overheads.tex b/cpu/overheads.tex index af17b3cfdf2f..ba4a33a4c45c 100644 --- a/cpu/overheads.tex +++ b/cpu/overheads.tex @@ -469,8 +469,10 @@ thousand clock cycles. % \QuickQuizE{ \Cref{tab:cpu:Performance of Synchronization Mechanisms on 16-CPU 2.8GHz Intel X5550 (Nehalem) System} - in the answer to \QuickQuizARef{\QspeedOfLightAtoms} says that - on-core CAS is faster than both of same-CPU CAS and on-core blind CAS\@. + in the answer to \QuickQuizARef{\QspeedOfLightAtoms} on + \cpageref{tab:cpu:Performance of Synchronization Mechanisms on 16-CPU 2.8GHz Intel X5550 (Nehalem) System} + says that on-core CAS is faster than both of same-CPU CAS and + on-core blind CAS\@. What is happening there? }\QuickQuizAnswerE{ I \emph{was} surprised by the data I obtained and did a rigorous -- 2.25.1