From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Jeffery Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:16:06 +1030 Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags In-Reply-To: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> References: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> Message-ID: List-Id: To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Kelly, On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 18:35 +0800, Kelly Hung wrote: > There are no changes to the Patch file, just the reviewed and acked tags are added. > PATCH v5 has been merged into the next branch. As others have said, please don't add tags that have not been explicitly given for your patches. Further, if a patch has been added to any upstream "next" branches it's not necessary to resend the patches beyond that point, unless there are errors that need correcting. Joel had added an earlier revision of your patches to a branch of candidate patches to upstream, and I've updated those in my own that I'm maintaining while he's on leave. I'd also added your patches to the OpenBMC kernel tree as a consequence, but you shouldn't apply tags to your upstream patches that other people didn't provide you on that basis. As for the concerns reported by Rob's bot, I've got a series that cleans up many of them. I'm working to find time to send them out. Hopefully these help reduce the noise in the future. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1126BC54E67 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2022a header.b=SGSYReUx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V48g43vRyz3dfb for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:47:12 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2022a header.b=SGSYReUx; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au (client-ip=203.29.241.158; helo=codeconstruct.com.au; envelope-from=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from codeconstruct.com.au (pi.codeconstruct.com.au [203.29.241.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V48dv2LsYz3c9y; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:46:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [192.168.68.112] (ppp118-210-177-226.adl-adc-lon-bras34.tpg.internode.on.net [118.210.177.226]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAF60200DB; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:46:06 +0800 (AWST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeconstruct.com.au; s=2022a; t=1711503969; bh=DoCy0+ib6v6kh81I+uYITM62RigPnYRn7LhIetEqj/4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SGSYReUx514D/YQ+nPzoRDe+VNpX1+4bd0+sgkj+S9BxnYQlJr28SitJmyf9HXSqJ cAoo3H4VX01C2Y3o+30J+cacOIZL7GNH7K7do9jakxF8Wi2Jb4UzYEB9ZvM2QElWtl RUzUAJs8iYHs0R/SNA1sl705EPRdGDdEyibHkwGiit4xrNUq9th6c82i6VQP4If63g oBuHZ0yU/zev3MWsWtPS/FNHMzEC5u0l98XjYTCpScNnxblbYKLCPnZaL9rdtpWYcV GkAfxBA5I+XVq6crl/Qy3isW1Ua0niQHTmy4Ezgc+hNAXHVKLTWKxFcou6fgItDI4E ITJTm7v27wWKw== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags From: Andrew Jeffery To: Kelly Hung , robh+dt@kernel.org Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:16:06 +1030 In-Reply-To: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> References: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kelly_hung@asus.com, joel@jms.id.au, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, Allenyy_Hsu@asus.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" Hi Kelly, On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 18:35 +0800, Kelly Hung wrote: > There are no changes to the Patch file, just the reviewed and acked tags = are added. > PATCH v5 has been merged into the next branch. As others have said, please don't add tags that have not been explicitly given for your patches. Further, if a patch has been added to any upstream "next" branches it's not necessary to resend the patches beyond that point, unless there are errors that need correcting. Joel had added an earlier revision of your patches to a branch of candidate patches to upstream, and I've updated those in my own that I'm maintaining while he's on leave. I'd also added your patches to the OpenBMC kernel tree as a consequence, but you shouldn't apply tags to your upstream patches that other people didn't provide you on that basis. As for the concerns reported by Rob's bot, I've got a series that cleans up many of them. I'm working to find time to send them out. Hopefully these help reduce the noise in the future. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0830BCD11DD for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:46:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rJeiGFhwdmPRg8VukgrOeYk6Ac9j66LsrdN60vO+ogY=; b=ffgPp+gln0TfKT TcTqK7CsG8koid+1UIaqUhtrV1DUWJKAKSsolm7XN5rkwn8oJ+33KHftKhc4gKoIDLIOwEwfHwC0v AKeY+93WbAmMN76TFds6v4nuaKLBa1aPAHDqaxCknVIQyTGfWba0G2lxE5mMbP7AWfbSpck1gddS4 pcU1ANwjUtMUtA6DryIMJAK2CeJU+LHkOyIP76Y8Fe01LeuoB2/7rhrPdHQsW2zXgfbsjtt6QLOkr u2Y7hZvHbP+DeLWwrVkd9q0nt5N48YGoV9BAwXb+AI0/CW9GtmpWqA6XXUYaefoPMiL8RbCnvV3qq xA7YCdo0vvoBnSwlwndg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rpIMy-0000000770w-3LB7; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:46:24 +0000 Received: from pi.codeconstruct.com.au ([203.29.241.158] helo=codeconstruct.com.au) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rpIMv-000000076yr-495Q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:46:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.68.112] (ppp118-210-177-226.adl-adc-lon-bras34.tpg.internode.on.net [118.210.177.226]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAF60200DB; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:46:06 +0800 (AWST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeconstruct.com.au; s=2022a; t=1711503969; bh=DoCy0+ib6v6kh81I+uYITM62RigPnYRn7LhIetEqj/4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SGSYReUx514D/YQ+nPzoRDe+VNpX1+4bd0+sgkj+S9BxnYQlJr28SitJmyf9HXSqJ cAoo3H4VX01C2Y3o+30J+cacOIZL7GNH7K7do9jakxF8Wi2Jb4UzYEB9ZvM2QElWtl RUzUAJs8iYHs0R/SNA1sl705EPRdGDdEyibHkwGiit4xrNUq9th6c82i6VQP4If63g oBuHZ0yU/zev3MWsWtPS/FNHMzEC5u0l98XjYTCpScNnxblbYKLCPnZaL9rdtpWYcV GkAfxBA5I+XVq6crl/Qy3isW1Ua0niQHTmy4Ezgc+hNAXHVKLTWKxFcou6fgItDI4E ITJTm7v27wWKw== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags From: Andrew Jeffery To: Kelly Hung , robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, kelly_hung@asus.com, Allenyy_Hsu@asus.com Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:16:06 +1030 In-Reply-To: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> References: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240326_184622_359531_10A00C41 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.39 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Kelly, On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 18:35 +0800, Kelly Hung wrote: > There are no changes to the Patch file, just the reviewed and acked tags are added. > PATCH v5 has been merged into the next branch. As others have said, please don't add tags that have not been explicitly given for your patches. Further, if a patch has been added to any upstream "next" branches it's not necessary to resend the patches beyond that point, unless there are errors that need correcting. Joel had added an earlier revision of your patches to a branch of candidate patches to upstream, and I've updated those in my own that I'm maintaining while he's on leave. I'd also added your patches to the OpenBMC kernel tree as a consequence, but you shouldn't apply tags to your upstream patches that other people didn't provide you on that basis. As for the concerns reported by Rob's bot, I've got a series that cleans up many of them. I'm working to find time to send them out. Hopefully these help reduce the noise in the future. Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from codeconstruct.com.au (pi.codeconstruct.com.au [203.29.241.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5724718C36; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.241.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711503974; cv=none; b=WErRdHrKkSIxkgC4vNa4eO84IeKhI+nHTP47E6gcX6Y/yTl23td/eHOr4xio1ySfIp4Tkt6hCUOWXXlqoeueaMEKfbzpvxRlU6cSpiLB0jl1nJlxZFEdiqgI+enddF3ZMe4eI8xUc4DdMDbBEPoCriXCadWtJCXaaAzKG63e5L4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711503974; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DoCy0+ib6v6kh81I+uYITM62RigPnYRn7LhIetEqj/4=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=S9wwvcRFA3GP2/v9WaJZ3qAtAwrBaOW4aMWX4+Sk0jJeiEqzgqKBLDUdF2i9hlLUKRllIwjJCSQzt9MBI/+FdV0OrKbufWGgKlRDcuytZ+MscWR7WgdoO9RvU4MHemvmRHlk3ivFR1lLkHyYsVPGVUBSD6AsCx0HbY/4fwJ5XLs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeconstruct.com.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.b=SGSYReUx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.241.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeconstruct.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.b="SGSYReUx" Received: from [192.168.68.112] (ppp118-210-177-226.adl-adc-lon-bras34.tpg.internode.on.net [118.210.177.226]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAF60200DB; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:46:06 +0800 (AWST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeconstruct.com.au; s=2022a; t=1711503969; bh=DoCy0+ib6v6kh81I+uYITM62RigPnYRn7LhIetEqj/4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SGSYReUx514D/YQ+nPzoRDe+VNpX1+4bd0+sgkj+S9BxnYQlJr28SitJmyf9HXSqJ cAoo3H4VX01C2Y3o+30J+cacOIZL7GNH7K7do9jakxF8Wi2Jb4UzYEB9ZvM2QElWtl RUzUAJs8iYHs0R/SNA1sl705EPRdGDdEyibHkwGiit4xrNUq9th6c82i6VQP4If63g oBuHZ0yU/zev3MWsWtPS/FNHMzEC5u0l98XjYTCpScNnxblbYKLCPnZaL9rdtpWYcV GkAfxBA5I+XVq6crl/Qy3isW1Ua0niQHTmy4Ezgc+hNAXHVKLTWKxFcou6fgItDI4E ITJTm7v27wWKw== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags From: Andrew Jeffery To: Kelly Hung , robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, kelly_hung@asus.com, Allenyy_Hsu@asus.com Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:16:06 +1030 In-Reply-To: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> References: <20240326103549.2413515-1-Kelly_Hung@asus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Kelly, On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 18:35 +0800, Kelly Hung wrote: > There are no changes to the Patch file, just the reviewed and acked tags = are added. > PATCH v5 has been merged into the next branch. As others have said, please don't add tags that have not been explicitly given for your patches. Further, if a patch has been added to any upstream "next" branches it's not necessary to resend the patches beyond that point, unless there are errors that need correcting. Joel had added an earlier revision of your patches to a branch of candidate patches to upstream, and I've updated those in my own that I'm maintaining while he's on leave. I'd also added your patches to the OpenBMC kernel tree as a consequence, but you shouldn't apply tags to your upstream patches that other people didn't provide you on that basis. As for the concerns reported by Rob's bot, I've got a series that cleans up many of them. I'm working to find time to send them out. Hopefully these help reduce the noise in the future. Andrew