From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-171.mta1.migadu.com (out-171.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D61253939 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 05:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748495737; cv=none; b=Pjd6kgg28YBJ5T424RUShlF91sOc2OZoll3QrT3CRmq5xowA4RjtNpRoPFkE7B3cGqOPoVh7aLjA5m2rlAudR8QFqMD9mvjGYY0CE5M9UXAh9lC5w49xJiUyEENTLNuEVI7f74BHXSE8WXqP4TEkgtOOTAPfKmOpOLOVFBk9K2w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748495737; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6uzPCgDCXAss+gj9Kg5Yei58AazKHO/YAsRvsFALGvw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VZvxTiWk16Kqf+ZS/sobuVj1i3wMfOhbCm1+xMvGvgxjOrPLRh9ZaTEUHV5GXYti3YOasxikZ5V/0mmGQ0W9CKhlrXC0JSqAXzaZ8EAPyoWCH/gfMFpQbC58MgXy/uCORxlQd1dBdALQgBpUA7F1oHTzdFvgMcPm7EjumV65/o0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ObYYFteh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ObYYFteh" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1748495722; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5Pk1Eb2vSHZbYbbZLyo5U1NwioDIXYgsUp9ezTkNplY=; b=ObYYFtehliQgfdv9YsufkQYdreAjIYc0E64+xUmOXpyZAGLUi3KQ5qjBDKGKhGQbr2gXbl +Ckk8pCdISYyqIC+bjZEqZ7+pMCxl2Ism9o12gOkQVTM0OVV0O9pH/x0Izj/T+Ru3xfAPq s7AfyOVLoGxpdbAhyE7WWpwl1QlON9Q= Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 13:14:32 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] net: stmmac: Add PCI driver support for BCM8958x To: Jitendra Vegiraju Cc: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" , Andrew Lunn , "Russell King (Oracle)" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com, ahalaney@redhat.com, xiaolei.wang@windriver.com, rohan.g.thomas@intel.com, Jianheng.Zhang@synopsys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, horms@kernel.org, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, Sagar Cheluvegowda References: <20241018205332.525595-1-jitendra.vegiraju@broadcom.com> <67919001-1cb7-4e9b-9992-5b3dd9b03406@quicinc.com> <7ac5c034-9e6d-45c4-b20a-2a386b4d9117@quicinc.com> <51768fa6-007e-4f30-ac1f-eed01ae1a3c5@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yanteng Si In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 5/29/25 10:56 AM, Jitendra Vegiraju 写道: > Hi Yanteng, > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:36 PM Yanteng Si wrote: >> 在 5/28/25 8:04 AM, Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) 写道: >>> >>> On 2/7/2025 3:18 PM, Jitendra Vegiraju wrote: >>>> Hi Abhishek, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:21 AM Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) < >>>> quic_abchauha@quicinc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/5/2024 8:12 AM, Jitendra Vegiraju wrote: >>>>>> Hi netdev team, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 1:53 PM wrote: >>>>>>> From: Jitendra Vegiraju >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patchset adds basic PCI ethernet device driver support for Broadcom >>>>>>> BCM8958x Automotive Ethernet switch SoC devices. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to seek your guidance on how to take this patch series >>>>> forward. >>>>>> Thanks to your feedback and Serge's suggestions, we made some forward >>>>>> progress on this patch series. >>>>>> Please make any suggestions to enable us to upstream driver support >>>>>> for BCM8958x. >>>>> Jitendra, >>>>> Have we resent this patch or got it approved ? I dont see any >>>>> updates after this patch. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Thank you for inquiring about the status of this patch. >>>> As stmmac driver is going through a maintainer transition, we wanted to >>>> wait until a new maintainer is identified. >>>> We would like to send the updated patch as soon as possible. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jitendra >>> Thanks Jitendra, I am sorry but just a follow up. >>> >>> Do we know if stmmac maintainer are identified now ? >> I'm curious why such a precondition is added？ >> > It's not a precondition. Let me give some context. > This patch series adds support for a new Hyper DMA(HDMA) MAC from Synopsis. > Many of the netdev community members reviewed the patches at that time. > Being the module maintainer at that time, Serge took the initiative to > guide us through integrating the new MAC into the stmmac driver. > We addressed all the review comments and submitted the last patch series. > Without an official maintainer, we didn't get feedback on the last patch series. > Because of this, we wanted to wait until a new maintainer is assigned > to this module. > As Abhishek expressed in his email, it appears the HDMA MAC is > becoming more mainstream. > We are hoping to rebase the patch series and resubmit for review if > netdev team members show interest. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241018205332.525595-1-jitendra.vegiraju@broadcom.com/ In my opinion, the precondition for waiting for a maintainer is that the patch set has passed the review. I checked lore and did not find any R&B tags in the patch set, which means your patch set has not yet met the merging requirements. Therefore, I think you can continue to push forward with this patch set and not let it stagnate. I will take some time to review the previous versions (which may take a while) and hope to be helpful. Thanks, Yanteng > Thanks, > Jitendra >> Thanks, >> Yanteng