diff for duplicates of <eb61966f-8666-80f6-1eab-c89bffe496b8@linux.dev>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index a4490fe..9a308d5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -39,3 +39,7 @@ On 10/6/23 4:24 PM, Andrew Kanner wrote:
 
 All make sense. I was mostly asking to add a comment at the "if (unlikely(size 
 == SIZE_MAX)" check to explain this details on why checking SIZE_MAX is enough.
+_______________________________________________
+Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
+Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index db433ae..d9d3eef 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -7,26 +7,26 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH bpf v3] net/xdp: fix zero-size allocation warning in xskq_create()\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 6 Oct 2023 16:58:18 -0700\0"
  "To\0Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@gmail.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
+ "Cc\0xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com"
+  daniel@iogearbox.net
+  maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
+  hawk@kernel.org
+  edumazet@google.com
+  aleksander.lobakin@intel.com
   netdev@vger.kernel.org
-  bpf@vger.kernel.org
+  john.fastabend@gmail.com
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  syzbot+fae676d3cf469331fc89@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+  davem@davemloft.net
   syzbot+b132693e925cbbd89e26@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
   bjorn@kernel.org
-  magnus.karlsson@intel.com
-  maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
+  ast@kernel.org
   jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
-  davem@davemloft.net
-  edumazet@google.com
   kuba@kernel.org
+  bpf@vger.kernel.org
   pabeni@redhat.com
-  aleksander.lobakin@intel.com
-  xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com
-  ast@kernel.org
-  hawk@kernel.org
-  john.fastabend@gmail.com
- " daniel@iogearbox.net\0"
+  linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+  syzbot+fae676d3cf469331fc89@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+ " magnus.karlsson@intel.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 10/6/23 4:24 PM, Andrew Kanner wrote:\n"
@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
  "> net/xdp/xsk_queue.c. If it's large enough - SIZE_MAX will be returned.\n"
  "\n"
  "All make sense. I was mostly asking to add a comment at the \"if (unlikely(size \n"
- "== SIZE_MAX)\" check to explain this details on why checking SIZE_MAX is enough."
+ "== SIZE_MAX)\" check to explain this details on why checking SIZE_MAX is enough.\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list\n"
+ "Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org\n"
+ https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
 
-64a6f4301bb7d5313d063646862115f320e619750fa187f140b80d99afb9ab69
+b5073c6cc74b161ea0437b9125c70bff6dd0ec29162bef041d85114ad4a973e1
