From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 11:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec39ce6d-e604-48ab-9582-04ff73d13c16@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <avE01iTQccxQnhl6@fedora>
On 11/9/26 04:01, Hao Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 03:19:01PM +0000, Harry Yoo wrote:
>>
>> > Given that, would it make sense to
>> > change this line to something like:
>> >
>> > if (type >= KMALLOC_PARTITION_START && type <= KMALLOC_PARTITION_END &&
>> > !slab_tiny_enabled)
>>
>> Maybe you could send a patch as it's a separate issue from the patchset?
>
> Sure thing! I'll post it once vbabka's slab_tiny series lands.
It would be better if the fix preceded the series actually.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 19:07 [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/8] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/8] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-28 11:43 ` Hao Li
2026-11-05 15:19 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-09 3:01 ` Hao Li
2026-11-11 10:30 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-11-11 11:36 ` Hao Li
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/8] mm, slab: make SLUB_TINY handling dynamic for sizing decisions Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/8] mm, slab: convert CONFIG_SLUB_TINY checks to kmem_cache_debug() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/8] mm, slab: remove remaining compile-time checks for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/8] mm, slab: add slab_tiny boot param Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] mm, slab: deprecate CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and reduce its Kconfig effects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-24 19:22 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec39ce6d-e604-48ab-9582-04ff73d13c16@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.