From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Jesse Zhang <Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, prike.liang@amd.com,
Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/userq: lock and validate wptr BOs before reading their GPU offset on restore
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:29:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec751f5b-e6bb-4c1d-93dd-f9d4418ab70f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814085626.80716-1-Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>
On 8/14/26 10:55, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> amdgpu_userq_vm_validate_and_restore_queue() reads each queue's wptr BO
> GPU offset via amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset() after only calling
> amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart() on it. But the wptr BOs are not part of this VM
> (their reservation object is their own, not vm->root), so neither
> amdgpu_vm_validate() nor amdgpu_userq_bo_validate() (which only handles
> the VM's evicted list) covers them. As a result a wptr BO can still be in
> TTM_PL_SYSTEM and unreserved when its offset is read, tripping the
> amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset() sanity checks from the restore worker:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: amdgpu_object.c:1486 at amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset+0x75/0xa0 [amdgpu], CPU#3: kworker/3:1/116
> Workqueue: events amdgpu_userq_restore_worker [amdgpu]
> RIP: 0010:amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset+0x75/0xa0 [amdgpu]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> amdgpu_userq_vm_validate_and_restore_queue+0x629/0x960 [amdgpu]
> amdgpu_userq_restore_worker+0xa6/0x180 [amdgpu]
> process_scheduled_works+0xa6/0x460
> worker_thread+0x13c/0x290
> kthread+0xfb/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x1b6/0x2b0
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: amdgpu_object.c:1485 at amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset+0x9a/0xa0 [amdgpu], CPU#2: kworker/2:1/127
> Workqueue: events amdgpu_userq_restore_worker [amdgpu]
> RIP: 0010:amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset+0x9a/0xa0 [amdgpu]
>
> amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart() only creates the GART mapping; it does not migrate
> the BO out of system memory, so the offset read is bogus (the queue would
> resume with a wrong wptr address).
>
> Lock each wptr BO into the drm_exec context and validate it into GTT
> inside the drm_exec_until_all_locked() block, mirroring what the create
> path (mes_userq_create_wptr_mapping) already does, so that the offset read
> later is safe and correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> index 17cc48d87c4d..59aa4802c111 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> @@ -1054,6 +1054,32 @@ amdgpu_userq_vm_validate_and_restore_queue(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
> drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> goto unlock_all;
> +
> + /*
> + * The per-queue wptr BOs are not part of this VM (their resv is
> + * their own, not vm->root), so the validation above does not
> + * cover them.
That's not correct.
The WPTR BOs absolutely must be part of the VM or otherwise the MES/CP/SDMA FW wouldn't be able to read it.
> + Lock and validate each into GTT here so that
> + * reading its GPU offset below is safe - matching what the
> + * create path (mes_userq_create_wptr_mapping) does.
> + */
> + xa_for_each(&uq_mgr->userq_xa, tmp_key, queue) {
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx wptr_ctx = { false, false };
> +
> + bo = queue->wptr_obj.obj;
> + if (!bo)
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = drm_exec_prepare_obj(&exec, &bo->tbo.base,
> + TTM_NUM_MOVE_FENCES + 1);
> + drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + goto unlock_all;
> +
> + amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo, bo->allowed_domains);
> + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &wptr_ctx);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + goto unlock_all;
> + }
Clear NAK to that, this is clearly not correct.
Regards,
Christian.
> }
>
> if (invalidated) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 8:55 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/userq: lock and validate wptr BOs before reading their GPU offset on restore Jesse Zhang
2026-08-14 11:29 ` Christian König [this message]
2026-08-17 6:44 ` Zhang, Jesse(Jie)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-17 7:05 Jesse Zhang
2026-08-24 13:28 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec751f5b-e6bb-4c1d-93dd-f9d4418ab70f@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Jesse.Zhang@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=prike.liang@amd.com \
--cc=sunil.khatri@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.