From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C483FC636CD for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D50E8211D; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 5D50E8211D X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U_Z_bc-M-Nw2; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901568212A; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 901568212A Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB9D1BF303 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4303D4192C for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 4303D4192C X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8fRAsQd-Gwj for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org C0C484192B Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C484192B for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id k8-20020a05600c1c8800b003dc57ea0dfeso6278241wms.0 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 05:12:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=39V+G+KNQS9FdXJkfeH4lM3TKpEM5glYr9e/0QEkjYY=; b=zvGqxvb3Pdz1Ym1ozbnffbeiNQKVYwD0Qx4B9VPrESgHWYHsaJtVQY0z8kZ2Yj8uJl 1I/tU3/1TeMvMg0upXVeSARgzI28CRog9wKmMDNnWnls6Pzkp+ld7lmuMJj0dCYxKLU8 88pEpjbtelJ085BwbEAzbFlV5IAWAeRwKA0+YzCw77tEFmG2Yx6Bh1gIEq9FMh3kwD+B 6gZtVRFNFbTm998DlJQWa9nbvWGXQ0SWTuCcAAd6ohnaU1snV4hdogI+gB1/WjeqNg+f 3YEwGPATq05Mj0ujH4KUenWMJldy1iUofkJyN8eXm8Jw0ayTmv5iV8hDkjdq84AUzKwC DztA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUqcizzVekBvfPZs22VfmwvjH0YeW87o6tvrmdBmjxtiepVBl58 A8ryqWtvzhF5hepdX/H+5FZyfQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+dXrEmOIlyhkbDhTsso2vacR0m0p4V1yKz9Eph3mhsUTGZjn8GyMreOnjzmnqMtzGe2bjFgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:81b:b0:3c6:e63e:23e9 with SMTP id k27-20020a05600c081b00b003c6e63e23e9mr16254083wmp.24.1676034748990; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:1811:3a7e:7b00:29c8:f1e0:f17f:3385? (ptr-9fplejngm4eebjbmd8l.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be. [2a02:1811:3a7e:7b00:29c8:f1e0:f17f:3385]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w19-20020a05600c475300b003dc433355aasm5935075wmo.18.2023.02.10.05.12.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Feb 2023 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:12:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Shahab Vahedi References: <97ea44bb-58fe-d6cb-6c79-9be0b245f2c6@synopsys.com> <29d2a8c7-44cd-da42-5fed-f17ec0f8ccf2@synopsys.com> <1750a14f-36a1-fe51-1452-3a72b84979c5@mind.be> <9a8b4ac5-6ffb-e8d8-3587-2768e004780e@synopsys.com> From: Arnout Vandecappelle In-Reply-To: <9a8b4ac5-6ffb-e8d8-3587-2768e004780e@synopsys.com> X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mind.be; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=39V+G+KNQS9FdXJkfeH4lM3TKpEM5glYr9e/0QEkjYY=; b=USkDu/KrUW4aquCfgJzJEXoLagqPOg8Y2ZRqhK6CJ97itdwOo2JASZ+kL9KfkXJU8R B5bafILnXaormADmyR3IAMMs7wppUymGXuNsB9SzqIlcq8SfCWPl7WdYd8oBMgW8Tt2s uW1khQazdWKK2O7twjKHnjVfGJZhrKJwURCZ0kRpcK2avG3CJMjyvOZ4ho0U8gMw1G5N 4o+LSFYhGK0sVuUMzvitSYlzNNbAXZjCIavcYiAtjdw3sBk+eVlsS41Y9NRZayXhq0D6 vBRIwzIAVriDP8Z5jbAwZqZ0mB/MTqGjK1V2z1TsZ9ObvuHnFXVzY5TmEMT4hZGrlWeI TgKA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mind.be header.i=@mind.be header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=USkDu/Kr Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/1] package/bpftool: revert bpf_cookie patch to allow building X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" , Alexey Brodkin , "buildroot@buildroot.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On 10/02/2023 10:17, Shahab Vahedi wrote: > On 2/9/23 21:27, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> >> On 09/02/2023 13:23, Shahab Vahedi wrote: >>> >>> On 2/8/23 17:36, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >>>> >>>> It's not clear to me why you did a revert of the cookie feature rather than >>>> using those patches. I think the first two or three should be sufficient to >>>> fix your issue? >>> >>> Ideally, the correct way would be applying that pending series. But since >>> there were comments that some of the patches might need reworking [1], I did >> >> I don't see anything in that thread about rework being needed, only some >> complaints about some mail gateway encrypting messages so they can't be >> read by some recipients... > See this [1] and the response here [2]. Having read it again, apparently it is Ah, but I guessed that that patch was not relevant for the issue you are facing. I had the impression only the first two or three patches of the series are relevant. > not such a big deal. Alexander, the author, mentioned that he will redo that > part in v3 of the patch the way David suggested. So either, I can make that > change when submitting to Buildroot, or take it as it is. Your call. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421003152.339542-3-alobakin@pm.me/T/#m42db58567febf12040f6ba0478e1a6148c284c55 > > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421003152.339542-3-alobakin@pm.me/T/#m293896646128262621c83e8c15c4d977f92ad0d2 > >>> not feel confident to add them. Therefore, I tried to keep my solution minimal >>> and solve it by eliminating the problem. I know, it is not appealing. >> >> The problem with your patch is that it is very difficult to decide if it >> should be kept or not when bumping the version. Plus, some people (or other >> packages) may rely on the feature that you remove. > > I can try to apply that patch series on top of bpftool-v7.1.0-br1.tar.gz in > buildroot. If it can be done fairly easily, I will submit it on a different > thread. Thanks! Regards, Arnout _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D0CC05027 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Id9ITtlDZVcOxbVqoli1z8atC1y0jdpLuiikWqM6cPQ=; b=igYvlfw+6qC8Ih UucGEBL1u+NOpqL1SCWQo/sRGlwKGPhNKfkR9eY0qt7PQiVQ1RA7hD2BGy2eo8VVQRwnMvPXWK7qx EHw1jrfJAlF6BA0kdQEowgGWTTWQ+gbeTAF0FyG7i935Yes1i7HsMKoRUNuY0Du4X4g6vM4Igb5tk SC085Mp3yMPqX+x/DYZ24Tt9IwCSpvFUvXw2Bv89wV1BU9cZS3EQPY4lX5tjM1aOdOzhaZ+b+RKwR E7FOlldeWiSpf3rYuu4b/rx4qTWuKhuZaL3S/iHG6/4tu4y8mz3WCJxIitCd5QmBjtt8PPdZR7Kru bB6QO+u4fUPuEBBk5GTg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pQTCd-005mvy-Vl; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:35 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pQTCY-005muw-I7 for linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:12:34 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id bg5-20020a05600c3c8500b003e00c739ce4so4014350wmb.5 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 05:12:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mind.be; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=39V+G+KNQS9FdXJkfeH4lM3TKpEM5glYr9e/0QEkjYY=; b=USkDu/KrUW4aquCfgJzJEXoLagqPOg8Y2ZRqhK6CJ97itdwOo2JASZ+kL9KfkXJU8R B5bafILnXaormADmyR3IAMMs7wppUymGXuNsB9SzqIlcq8SfCWPl7WdYd8oBMgW8Tt2s uW1khQazdWKK2O7twjKHnjVfGJZhrKJwURCZ0kRpcK2avG3CJMjyvOZ4ho0U8gMw1G5N 4o+LSFYhGK0sVuUMzvitSYlzNNbAXZjCIavcYiAtjdw3sBk+eVlsS41Y9NRZayXhq0D6 vBRIwzIAVriDP8Z5jbAwZqZ0mB/MTqGjK1V2z1TsZ9ObvuHnFXVzY5TmEMT4hZGrlWeI TgKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=39V+G+KNQS9FdXJkfeH4lM3TKpEM5glYr9e/0QEkjYY=; b=2I6ghelm4C2fjXkZnRfRSMmaU1UUis2sB2tbn9odjxEpDXm1OyDAMJ+1e0eUgPWBvF QQuApouM2MlcX0WDfPjT1bsd6UFtXNNHFvVagoUww0PLV+aRUvwyqiWxLSRkyxPwho0n aog6241nxvB7sPHd+Pvt0yUKu0SbcbvxuY3aS35jb7590v7MoSB829C47AM3JgIa1eRO bNTwNm38ZGA5QI//Ipc7Ox2t0RziQsWUV71KpHr20d+C34aLO4JsWmv/L0SE0s1iIzef zTCmSTbqT0Toi/z51NEaCp6WEx+P8HA/RcfSjM/q1GM1cL6lfll6EVIZUhARi/vUYrE/ iAQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV/tD1mvmrW0Q7Lbzh1ld5/vonmsW0rLgZJgNIrUVYP5WHDQIim nKBPmGd0tpzW+3vnVJSNxXElSw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+dXrEmOIlyhkbDhTsso2vacR0m0p4V1yKz9Eph3mhsUTGZjn8GyMreOnjzmnqMtzGe2bjFgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:81b:b0:3c6:e63e:23e9 with SMTP id k27-20020a05600c081b00b003c6e63e23e9mr16254083wmp.24.1676034748990; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:1811:3a7e:7b00:29c8:f1e0:f17f:3385? (ptr-9fplejngm4eebjbmd8l.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be. [2a02:1811:3a7e:7b00:29c8:f1e0:f17f:3385]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w19-20020a05600c475300b003dc433355aasm5935075wmo.18.2023.02.10.05.12.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Feb 2023 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:12:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/1] package/bpftool: revert bpf_cookie patch to allow building Content-Language: en-GB To: Shahab Vahedi Cc: "buildroot@buildroot.org" , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" , Alexey Brodkin References: <97ea44bb-58fe-d6cb-6c79-9be0b245f2c6@synopsys.com> <29d2a8c7-44cd-da42-5fed-f17ec0f8ccf2@synopsys.com> <1750a14f-36a1-fe51-1452-3a72b84979c5@mind.be> <9a8b4ac5-6ffb-e8d8-3587-2768e004780e@synopsys.com> From: Arnout Vandecappelle In-Reply-To: <9a8b4ac5-6ffb-e8d8-3587-2768e004780e@synopsys.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230210_051230_637827_8145FB36 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 10/02/2023 10:17, Shahab Vahedi wrote: > On 2/9/23 21:27, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> >> On 09/02/2023 13:23, Shahab Vahedi wrote: >>> >>> On 2/8/23 17:36, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >>>> >>>> It's not clear to me why you did a revert of the cookie feature rather than >>>> using those patches. I think the first two or three should be sufficient to >>>> fix your issue? >>> >>> Ideally, the correct way would be applying that pending series. But since >>> there were comments that some of the patches might need reworking [1], I did >> >> I don't see anything in that thread about rework being needed, only some >> complaints about some mail gateway encrypting messages so they can't be >> read by some recipients... > See this [1] and the response here [2]. Having read it again, apparently it is Ah, but I guessed that that patch was not relevant for the issue you are facing. I had the impression only the first two or three patches of the series are relevant. > not such a big deal. Alexander, the author, mentioned that he will redo that > part in v3 of the patch the way David suggested. So either, I can make that > change when submitting to Buildroot, or take it as it is. Your call. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421003152.339542-3-alobakin@pm.me/T/#m42db58567febf12040f6ba0478e1a6148c284c55 > > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421003152.339542-3-alobakin@pm.me/T/#m293896646128262621c83e8c15c4d977f92ad0d2 > >>> not feel confident to add them. Therefore, I tried to keep my solution minimal >>> and solve it by eliminating the problem. I know, it is not appealing. >> >> The problem with your patch is that it is very difficult to decide if it >> should be kept or not when bumping the version. Plus, some people (or other >> packages) may rely on the feature that you remove. > > I can try to apply that patch series on top of bpftool-v7.1.0-br1.tar.gz in > buildroot. If it can be done fairly easily, I will submit it on a different > thread. Thanks! Regards, Arnout _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc