From: Yu Ning <yu.ning@linux.intel.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Yu Ning <yu.ning@intel.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hax-interface: Add BSD license
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:03:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed07d728-dc3d-3f45-23de-f4058aaf8f38@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171116180003.GO3111@localhost.localdomain>
On 11/17/2017 2:00, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 07:47:44AM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 16.11.2017 um 07:50 schrieb yu.ning@linux.intel.com:
>>> From: Yu Ning <yu.ning@intel.com>
>>>
>>> hax-interface.h defines the interface between the HAXM kernel
>>> module and the HAXM QEMU accelerator. The same code can be found in
>>> the following files of the HAXM kernel module:
>>>
>>> include/hax_interface.h
>>> include/vcpu_state.h
>>> core/include/vm.h
>>>
>>> These files are now open source under the 3-clause BSD license,
>>> whereas hax-interface.h in QEMU uses GPLv2.
> Why is this a problem?
I know very little about licenses. If this is not a problem, I'm happy
to just abandon this patch.
>
>>> Address this inconsistency by adding the BSD license to the QEMU
>>> file, per Stefan Weil's comment on this HAXM pull request:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/intel/haxm/pull/2
> The existing code on qemu.git don't match the code on the GitHub
> repository above exactly, and its copyright history looks hard to
> track[1].
Right. I don't know when the QEMU header (hax-interface.h) first
appeared, but I think it's probably a derivative of the HAXM ones, which
date back to no later than June 2011.
> If we really care about consistency between the two
> projects, shouldn't we just delete the existing file and copy the
> headers from github.com/intel/haxm directly?
That's a good solution, but not feasible at the moment, because in the
HAXM kernel module, a small piece of the interface code currently
resides in an internal header (core/include/vm.h). Probably we should
clean up the interface headers on the HAXM side, and then push the
change to QEMU.
> Also, does it even make sense to keep the two licenses in the
> file?
I don't know the answer. If it doesn't make sense, I can either remove
the original GPLv2 license, or abandon this patch and later come back
with another one implementing the above solution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-17 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 6:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hax-interface: Add BSD license yu.ning
2017-11-16 6:47 ` Stefan Weil
2017-11-16 18:00 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-11-17 9:03 ` Yu Ning [this message]
2017-11-19 21:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-11-20 7:17 ` Yu Ning
2017-11-20 7:41 ` Kamil Rytarowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed07d728-dc3d-3f45-23de-f4058aaf8f38@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.ning@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=vpalatin@chromium.org \
--cc=yu.ning@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.