From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, yosryahmed@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Dao <dqminh@cloudflare.com>,
Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>,
jr@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cgroup/rstat: add cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock helpers and tracepoints
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 21:54:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed67836b-3235-4a56-a923-1a5c7a14db52@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mnakwztmiskni3k6ia5mynqfllb3dw5kicuv4wp4e4ituaezwt@2pzkuuqg6r3e>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]
On 06/05/2024 18.22, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Anyways did the mutex change helped your production workload regarding
> latencies?
Yes, see attached NET_RX softirq latency improvement with mutex patch[1].
Showing two grafana heatmaps over softirq wait (no-able-to run) time.
It is very clear that most of the latency spikes are gone with mutex
patch applied.
--Jesper
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/171328989335.3930751.3091577850420501533.stgit@firesoul/
[-- Attachment #2: softirq_wait_time_compare01.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 119601 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 14:04 [PATCH v1] cgroup/rstat: add cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock helpers and tracepoints Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-01 14:24 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-01 17:22 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-01 18:41 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-02 11:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-02 18:19 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-03 14:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-03 14:30 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-03 19:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-06 12:03 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-06 16:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-06 16:28 ` Ivan Babrou
2024-05-06 19:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-06 19:54 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2024-05-02 19:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-03 12:58 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-03 18:11 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-14 5:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-05-14 5:55 ` Tejun Heo
2024-05-14 16:59 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-15 16:58 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed67836b-3235-4a56-a923-1a5c7a14db52@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dqminh@cloudflare.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ivan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jr@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.