From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com (mail-pf1-f194.google.com [209.85.210.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1515F71984 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 01:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id n22so7169167pfa.3 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 17:50:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gwkd3udu7lACJtyL9+m6Gmrn0G0TT13j1T2E5Y4n6E8=; b=ZZKNOAILEAJy/QREn9lrIU9HXDHPQ897W+ym4TEAMh9yaXSGDf18op/FYdWTMy37+S 8A8uuTOdxe7YrIwdIEsIxBT8u3kZ+GTsmpE4IaucudOS646GJhQVGMb6fG9wRj1dtjVJ +N31R9z0v3d6oDNtD68I+kSyOQuAinGNaQbj3b6nD+rpWsdFf6SYecDvTw74XtGhRf69 f9/iBI6MMXQrcE+HitAfeTe3BFVr42w88APRV/2NaL+9z7WCXxjTICTm+bti46Wm6RTo fPfZU3pnGf78grlu3YshilFecAZyH5eabOS9HWIuoSgELsg2qsx02XUFLZMn1r2KcxcK F4BA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gwkd3udu7lACJtyL9+m6Gmrn0G0TT13j1T2E5Y4n6E8=; b=hB288hfDS/GR8yQUHAf7woN15ZYvskKhEINohKToJywhr3bj5x3XBodjZ1sg6kvMkH qZqwZjsweLEqTyrETnR5CdQ28NMSLZxGgXULkI7w52NHqN5vX36ID9RAY9a9CQKsZO8g Jq9nG77VsIaknMn/XIf1NBAOlSVTf8TKs1aDfQfWA2zw+2vpN82GWWhruFTvCKYrg7CH W4zDuOB+HmZtVJeRF3B1SE1mPodsyqKi1V8SbdbzUB8wtPgZsbKNVBHm9h2vxIiPgLw6 70xIDRlujeTb3kEYC5nBxrXVs9Qd5V+YIH88K9V97GJDdtx0FPyoZEWfvEpB2A+qq7F/ HlAw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXLjUMMaKNrj829ldT3SAsljs8I9kD+S/04TluJYUKfzQgpin5I +8o+VOU7di+BX9uvf8FVIXfSH7s5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwWjG8nAgIy56bxTjk2Ja0INmP0h7P+w5q7ILlXZY9ZLfL9PWOCN5GQX/qoaJ2c48a7v2gFAg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ce4a:: with SMTP id r10mr3849320pgi.336.1551837026810; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 17:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local ([2601:646:8500:6bc6:e91a:c092:698a:a99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm248922pgq.54.2019.03.05.17.50.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Mar 2019 17:50:25 -0800 (PST) To: Maxime BORGES , Otavio Salvador References: <20190225140010.19025-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <7351b76e423f4e2897e99b536e8c0efd@strataggem.com> From: Khem Raj Organization: HIMVIS LLC Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:50:24 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:65.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/65.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7351b76e423f4e2897e99b536e8c0efd@strataggem.com> Cc: Meta-OpenEmbedded Mailing listing Subject: Re: [meta-oe PATCH 1/2] python-idna: Avoid removing '+x' from `.egg-info/` directory X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:50:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Maxime, I think we need to understand it a bit better, eg. should we need to change the mode for directories or just files. I Think it deserves a new patch, I am going to apply Otavio's patch and then you can try if that does not work then lets fix it by changing perms for files. On 3/1/19 8:38 AM, Maxime BORGES wrote: > For reference: > > https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/pull/92#issue-216348464 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De :* Khem Raj > *Envoyé :* vendredi 1 mars 2019 16:56:31 > *À :* Otavio Salvador; Maxime BORGES > *Cc :* Burton, Ross; Otavio Salvador; Meta-OpenEmbedded Mailing listing > *Objet :* Re: [oe] [meta-oe PATCH 1/2] python-idna: Avoid removing '+x' > from `.egg-info/` directory > Otavio > > Can you resend this patch series, its missing in patchwork, so > hopefully, it will catch it this time. > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:05 AM Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:38 AM Otavio Salvador >> wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:03 PM Burton, Ross wrote: >> > > >> > > The original patch doesn't explain what it's doing and is clearly >> > > going to remove executable bits from directories, which clearly isn't >> > > right. >> > > >> > > I'd say remove it, and *then* if it breaks again fix properly. >> > >> > I am with Ross here. It is a really ugly patch and if need, we need a >> > comment on the code and a proper reason to add it back. >> > >> >> +Maxime for information on the original patch